You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #18: No it's not...
[View All]
jberryhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-04-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
The entire reason it's a backscatter detector is because it uses a lower wavelength than medical x-rays and detects what bounces off, instead of measuring absorption on the other side.
Where are you getting that from?
(And that's for the backscatter detectors, not the millimeter wave machines which are preferred)
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.