Reply #109: Really? You don't understand this?

[Milo_Bloom]

The negative is because Axelrod refused to CITE ANY EVIDENCE and instead said they must prove they are NOT DOING IT.

In short, Axelrod REFUSES to accept the evidence that has been presented, but still is trying to shift the burden to the accused.


The reason it is different than your other link is because the US isn't DENYING it's involvement. "Despite numerous requests filed under the Freedom of Information Act, the U.S. has not turned over all the names of recipient organizations of USAID funds. Bolivia is a major recipient of USAID money, with millions of dollars sent to groups there. The U.S. also funds groups in Bolivia through the National Endowment for Democracy and related organizations." What they are refusing to do is give all the names over.

In this case the CoC is completely DENYING the accusation and Axelrod, for whatever reason, is refusing to rely on the circumstantial evidence presented in the article.