You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #112: Hmmm? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. Hmmm?
"The negative is because Axelrod refused to CITE ANY EVIDENCE and instead said they must prove they are NOT DOING IT."

So you're only upset that Axelrod didn't provide the evidence that exists on a talk show?

Did you want the DNC to put the evidence in their 30-second ad too?

The evidence exists so how does this make the Democrats look like idiots as you claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC