You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: But how risky is it really? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
BrownOak Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-15-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. But how risky is it really?
There's no way this evidence, which is likely to be key to the prosecution gets tossed in something this visible. Nifong had to have known that when he instructed the police to abandon their policy of including fillers in the lineup.

Still, he has to know that the flawed lineup will cast some doubt into the alleged victim's ID of the suspects. As Torchie said earlier, it could be because he's so confident in everything else around the case. But I think it's equally plausible that he's not confident and that the thing he really couldn't afford was for the AV to identify a person that wasn't on the team and therefore not at the party. In fact, there are several things that would lead to that conclusion:

-If he had strong evidence outside of the ID, why the need to wait for the second round of the DNA tests? Why the need for those tests at all? Why not indict all three guys at the same time.

-On the Friday before the first grand jury, the police visited several players to interview them without their attorneys present. The questions they asked were if the players would tell them who was at the party. This would indicate to me that there was some doubt in Nifong's mind in that regard.

-Two weeks ago Nifong announced that they were going to be reopening the deferred prosecution arrangements against all lacrosse players unless they could prove they weren't at the party. Again, this shows he had some doubts about who was at the party. The first guy they went after on those deferred prosecution deals.... Dave Evans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC