Reply #27: Meh..

[-..__...]

And those "reasonable" (good thing you used those dit-dits) restrictions would be ...?

Do tell.

That's an easy one!

A national firearms registration database...

A ban on "assault weapons" and "hi-capacity magazines"...

Closing the "gun show loophole"...

Licensing for all firearms owners...

"Safe storage" laws...

Ballistic finger printing...

Did I miss any?

Does that sound "reasonable" to you?

Oh wait... gosh darn I misread the question!

Let's try this again...

How about... The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".





I read about it at the time. Gosh, you must think foreigners are ignorant

So, why did you state the "surprised" opinion that being an "RKBA enthusiast" had any relevance to my (and others), being dissatisfied with the courts decision?



Btw, I don't know what "interest-based" is. I said public interest-based.

Ye fail to fathom the understanding of those context based "dit-dat"/ little finger thingies """"""


And I've certainly seen what "progressive members" (again, whew for those dit-dits) of DU have to say about quite a lot of things. Up here, and in the rest of the world, they'd be called "far right wing". You know: death penalty and various other aspects of sentencing, equality rights of GLBT people, etc. etc. Stinky far right wing. 'k?

See... that's what you're missing and fail to understand... this isn't "Up here" or the rest of the world. Myself and many others could give a flying fuck about what "up here" is like and your Kanada Über Allies brow beating/chest thumping. It has little to no relevance here.

Of course there are some DU'ers here that will lambaste me for that, but as you say the opinion at DU as the arbiter of anything...

:shrug:


]Anything actually not clear there?

ohhh... it's quite clear...

A) That the statement is a fact and not an opinion.

B) That any schoolchild with minimal reading compression skills could study the BOR/US Constitution and not find a single reference to reproductive rights...

C) that any "clear" thinking person would not confine that fact/speaking point as the sole property of the "anti-choice brigade".

Need I explain it more clearly, or should I t-y-p-e s-l-o-w-e-r ?

Feel free to clean up my board code and grammar usage for me... all those <[[ >]] and """ are hurting my eyes.