| 160. This pick is probably as less-harmful to progressive values as could be expected from this |
|
administration. It was never going to be a liberal to balance out the reich-wingers who dominate the court now. She won't do much damage, though - just not a lot of good countering the Catholic Mafia.
|
| -Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court |
rawstory |
May-26-09 07:13 AM |
#0 |
-
I Am So Not Excited |
Demeter |
May-26-09 07:19 AM |
#1 |
 -
Since when does he not know how to "play for keeps?" |
ecstatic |
May-26-09 07:34 AM |
#3 |
 -
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that Sotomayor will be disastrous? |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 07:38 AM |
#5 |
  -
Well at least we can predict that baseball will be well adjudicated. nt |
ooglymoogly |
May-26-09 10:03 AM |
#72 |
 -
in your opinion. hardly some undying truth. |
cali |
May-26-09 07:40 AM |
#6 |
  -
No one's opinion, including Obama's (or yours), is "some undying truth." |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 07:53 AM |
#12 |
 -
What !??!?!?! |
TomClash |
May-26-09 08:22 AM |
#28 |
  -
That post was written long before any appointment, or even vacancy, was announced |
alcibiades_mystery |
May-26-09 10:36 AM |
#90 |
 -
wow... do you know how foolish your post is? I am so unimpressed |
kid a |
May-26-09 10:09 AM |
#76 |
 -
Name the really bad appointments. |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 11:10 AM |
#98 |
  -
OK... |
Iowa |
May-26-09 02:27 PM |
#163 |
 -
Pretend you're Obama and replace his appointments |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 04:31 PM |
#197 |
 -
Your "concern" is duly noted. |
kestrel91316 |
May-26-09 11:35 AM |
#112 |
 -
what an embarrassing post |
LSK |
May-26-09 03:22 PM |
#180 |
 -
Another DOOM AND GLOOM post |
Cha |
May-26-09 05:58 PM |
#215 |
-
AP says it's Sotomayor. SCOTUS overdue for a Hispanic and another woman, IMO, but is she the |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 07:31 AM |
#2 |
 -
Older then I would have like yes, Hopfully we will get 20 years of left leaning opinions out of her |
Fluffdaddy |
May-26-09 08:18 AM |
#26 |
  -
Centrist opinions may be more likely, if descriptions of her are correct. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:29 AM |
#34 |
 -
I think the biggest litmus test for whether she's centrist is her position on corporate personhood! |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 09:11 AM |
#56 |
  -
NOW, THIS IS WORTH DISCUSSING |
livefreest |
May-26-09 10:31 AM |
#88 |
  -
The Problem with Using Corporate Personhood as a Litmus Test |
On the Road |
May-26-09 10:39 AM |
#91 |
   -
It never "became law" in the constitution. Only a court clerk felt it should be law! |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 10:48 AM |
#92 |
  -
It May Have Been True at the Time |
On the Road |
May-26-09 11:05 AM |
#96 |
  -
If it is brought up as an issue protecting stare decisis without legislation to take it down... |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 11:12 AM |
#100 |
  -
corporate personhood...100%? |
AlbertCat |
May-26-09 12:37 PM |
#135 |
   -
Yeah, this ruling is a bit confusing to me... |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 12:45 PM |
#137 |
  -
I disagree that that is an important litmus test. Things like separation of church and |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:00 PM |
#172 |
   -
It is because it is NOT a constitutional protection! |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 04:40 PM |
#201 |
  -
The US Constitution is a limit on GOVERNMENT RIGHTS, not PERSONAL RIGHTS |
Doctor_J |
May-26-09 07:37 PM |
#222 |
 -
I agree, this goes along with our president's move towards center. |
wisteria |
May-26-09 12:57 PM |
#143 |
 -
I don't think Obama has to move to get to the center. And I don't think it has to do only with |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 02:36 PM |
#166 |
 -
Clinton appointed her to the Court of Appeals |
TomClash |
May-26-09 08:25 AM |
#31 |
  -
Who said she was a Republican? However, if Bush appointed her, she certainly cannot be |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:31 AM |
#35 |
   -
Daniel Patrick Moynihan "appointed" her, not Bush Sr. |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 08:54 AM |
#48 |
    -
Please, I don't believe for a second that it was that clear cut and Bush 41 had no say at |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 02:47 PM |
#168 |
   -
I don't think you get it |
TomClash |
May-26-09 09:22 AM |
#57 |
    -
Sorry, what you are saying is simply not Constitutionally possible. A single Senator cannot |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:06 PM |
#174 |
   -
HamdenRice is correct |
TomClash |
May-26-09 03:26 PM |
#182 |
   -
The poster is knee jerking and |
Cha |
May-26-09 06:03 PM |
#217 |
   -
Didn't Bush appoint Souter? |
deaniac21 |
May-26-09 02:32 PM |
#165 |
    -
Yes, and Bush's position is that Souter betrayed him, as I had posted in Reply #35. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:14 PM |
#176 |
   -
You don't mention that Clinton promoted Sotomayor |
AlexanderProgressive |
May-26-09 07:41 PM |
#223 |
   -
Bush appointed Souter, a very liberal judge |
AlexanderProgressive |
May-26-09 07:03 PM |
#220 |
  -
Didn't Ike appoint Warren? |
deaniac21 |
May-27-09 10:52 AM |
#235 |
  -
Moynihan wasn't much of a Democrat, either . . .!! |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 09:51 AM |
#65 |
 -
54 is too old??? OMFG. |
kestrel91316 |
May-26-09 11:37 AM |
#114 |
  -
She has type 1 diabetes and so is at much higher risk |
kegler14 |
May-26-09 01:31 PM |
#156 |
   -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-26-09 04:34 PM |
#199 |
  -
Given how young Bush 43's appointees were, yes, I would have preferred a younger judge. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:19 PM |
#177 |
 -
Bush also appointed Souter ... |
waiting for hope |
May-26-09 12:03 PM |
#126 |
-
Please see Reply # 35. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:21 PM |
#179 |
-
Got it - and Sandra Day O'Connor |
waiting for hope |
May-26-09 07:29 PM |
#221 |
-
At the same time as the CA |
WyLoochka |
May-26-09 07:37 AM |
#4 |
-
seems like a good choice .. |
InfiniteThoughts |
May-26-09 07:41 AM |
#7 |
 -
Killer Joe is calling her "The Most Liberal Pick" |
Joe Bacon |
May-26-09 07:43 AM |
#9 |
  -
that's finalizes it for me ... |
InfiniteThoughts |
May-26-09 08:08 AM |
#18 |
   -
He has not yet voted; and I would not base anything on Lieberman, one way or the other. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:33 AM |
#36 |
    -
Um... |
PassingFair |
May-26-09 09:10 AM |
#55 |
   -
Um.... |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:23 PM |
#181 |
   -
Yes Yes for her ~ If Boring Joe says No ,I say Yes! |
goclark |
May-26-09 08:56 AM |
#50 |
  -
You do realize that Joe would say that about ANY pick Obama made. |
dbonds |
May-26-09 09:46 AM |
#61 |
  -
I do realize ~ he is trying for the #1 Thug slot |
goclark |
May-26-09 01:07 PM |
#150 |
  -
That goes for almost any pick The President picks. |
sellitman |
May-26-09 01:14 PM |
#152 |
  -
that ass would say that anyone Obama chooses is |
dana_b |
May-26-09 10:10 AM |
#78 |
  -
OMG, The party in power gets to have its say? |
RedCloud |
May-26-09 11:28 AM |
#105 |
 -
The New Haven firefighters' case will be front and center of their attack |
customerserviceguy |
May-26-09 08:12 AM |
#23 |
-
I hope the SCOTUS finds a way to avoid reversing her, maybe by remanding for more findings. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:35 AM |
#38 |
-
Have they ever given any evidence of "reverse discrimination" . .. ??? |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 09:54 AM |
#68 |
-
Expect them to trot out arguments |
customerserviceguy |
May-26-09 04:43 PM |
#202 |
-
This will be the chance for the |
Are_grits_groceries |
May-26-09 07:41 AM |
#8 |
 -
I thought the same thing. |
Odin2005 |
May-26-09 07:53 AM |
#11 |
  -
It was the nicest thing that |
Are_grits_groceries |
May-26-09 07:58 AM |
#14 |
  -
Latina... they fight hard against her, they lose the vote forever. |
CBR |
May-26-09 08:06 AM |
#17 |
   -
And we have a winner!! lock thread. |
mystieus |
May-26-09 11:09 AM |
#97 |
  -
That asshole belongs in a trunk |
saigon68 |
May-26-09 08:13 AM |
#24 |
 -
I think even the Republicans are too savvy to make a cheap remark about her ethnicity. They have |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:23 AM |
#30 |
  -
At this point, |
Are_grits_groceries |
May-26-09 08:34 AM |
#37 |
   -
I hope you're more correct than I am, but people on the edge of a cliff tend to watch |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:43 AM |
#42 |
  -
The smart ones won't make cheap ones. But how |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 11:56 AM |
#120 |
   -
Oh, I meant elected Republicans or Steele. Limbaugh and his kind--I make no comment on |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:26 PM |
#183 |
  -
But isn't LImbaugh the leader of the Republican Party? |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 04:29 PM |
#196 |
  -
foxx and bachman are elected |
noiretextatique |
May-26-09 06:42 PM |
#219 |
  -
they were already dog whistling.. she's an affirmative action pick- not that bright... |
bettyellen |
May-26-09 01:30 PM |
#155 |
 -
lol--but too true |
emsimon33 |
May-26-09 09:03 AM |
#52 |
 -
Ben Nelson comment ... real funny |
InfiniteThoughts |
May-26-09 11:25 AM |
#103 |
 -
I can just imagine Rahm |
fujiyama |
May-26-09 12:11 PM |
#129 |
-
WTF! How does she represent me? The last guy inserted two white males. |
onehandle |
May-26-09 07:49 AM |
#10 |
 -
I love your humor! |
JayMusgrove |
May-26-09 07:58 AM |
#13 |
 -
Yep. And about damn time, too! (j/k) Fortunately, the SCOTUS is supposed to |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 08:39 AM |
#39 |
 -
This is a great opportunity for progressive views to really come forward. |
Xenotime |
May-26-09 11:26 AM |
#104 |
-
A centrist. What a surprise. |
Lasher |
May-26-09 07:59 AM |
#15 |
 -
And the republicans |
Jakes Progress |
May-26-09 08:09 AM |
#20 |
  -
+1 |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:09 PM |
#190 |
 -
Prove she's a centrist? please post links of her "centrist" opinions |
Fluffdaddy |
May-26-09 08:11 AM |
#22 |
  -
She is considered a political centrist by the American Bar Association Journal & the New York Time |
Lasher |
May-26-09 02:08 PM |
#161 |
 -
Really? The head of the liberal Constitution Accountability Center has high praise for Sotomayor. |
ClarkUSA |
May-26-09 09:03 AM |
#51 |
  -
"she is strongly opposed by conservative groups" |
GreenArrow |
May-26-09 09:31 AM |
#59 |
   -
Sotomayor ruled in favor of minimum wage for homeless workers in class action suit |
ClarkUSA |
May-26-09 12:08 PM |
#128 |
   -
so your opinion of her is based only on the Prez's other appointments, LOL? |
bettyellen |
May-26-09 01:23 PM |
#153 |
  -
"my opinion of her" |
GreenArrow |
May-27-09 09:57 AM |
#232 |
  -
Quoting conservative groups to try to prove she is liberal does not do it. They consider anyone |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:31 PM |
#184 |
 -
A woman is good . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 09:56 AM |
#70 |
 -
I don't like far lefties either. a centralist is fine with me. |
okieinpain |
May-26-09 10:22 AM |
#84 |
  -
You are entitled to prefer a centrist. However, the choices are not only centrist or "far leftie." |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:44 PM |
#185 |
 -
Why are you defining her as a centrist? |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 11:58 AM |
#121 |
-
Here is why: |
Lasher |
May-26-09 02:28 PM |
#164 |
-
Thanks for the link. Her decisions don't |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 03:00 PM |
#171 |
-
Keep in mind, the Republican noise machine is in high gear right now. |
Lasher |
May-26-09 03:14 PM |
#175 |
 -
Thanks for all the links. Very informative |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 04:28 PM |
#195 |
-
Bar Associations would review all her decisions before coming up with a description, not just one or |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 03:52 PM |
#186 |
-
Get ready for Republican nut jobs |
spiritual_gunfighter |
May-26-09 08:01 AM |
#16 |
 -
Faux News: She's "too liberal"!!! RNC gears up for fundraising and a fight. Alert the teabaggers! |
ClarkUSA |
May-26-09 08:10 AM |
#21 |
-
Teabaggers are lining up. This will be their big issue for the year |
JayMusgrove |
May-26-09 08:54 AM |
#49 |
 -
McCain was born in Panama too... |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 09:05 AM |
# |
  -
Supposedly (and probably). McCain was born on a U.S. base in Panama to two U.S. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:03 PM |
#188 |
 -
Yeah, I wonder what the right wing would do with someone like me... |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 05:01 PM |
#208 |
 -
Except Puerto Rico is US soil. No customs forms needed to mail stuff there, |
iris27 |
May-26-09 10:16 PM |
#231 |
 -
Sonia Sotomayor was born in The Bronx NY |
Adelante |
May-27-09 10:31 AM |
#233 |
-
If Faux News hates it, then you know it's good! |
Crowman1979 |
May-26-09 09:53 AM |
#67 |
 -
Not really. Faux News hates anyone left of O'Reilly.There is a lot of territory between that |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:08 PM |
#189 |
-
Typical fund raising tactic. They have to say this. Did you expect them to be overjoyed? |
wisteria |
May-26-09 01:00 PM |
#145 |
-
Thank God we still have legal/intellectual GIANTS like Thomas and Scalia! |
FailureToCommunicate |
May-26-09 08:08 AM |
#19 |
-
Excellent, from Raw: |
elleng |
May-26-09 08:16 AM |
#25 |
-
I think she's a great choice too. |
Dappleganger |
May-26-09 08:18 AM |
#27 |
-
Too old...but whatev. nt |
Phoonzang |
May-26-09 08:22 AM |
#29 |
 -
She's 55. That's on the outer edge, imo, but not too old. |
cali |
May-26-09 08:27 AM |
#33 |
  -
"Don't trust anyone over thirty" Or is it twenty? Wait, what did I come in here for? |
FailureToCommunicate |
May-26-09 08:39 AM |
#41 |
  -
It is old in comparison to Dummya's picks. I was hoping for someone who is |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:14 PM |
#191 |
 -
Why is she too old? She has at least 15 to 20 more years. n/t |
RebelOne |
May-26-09 08:39 AM |
#40 |
  -
She's also a type 1 diabetic |
wickerwoman |
May-26-09 12:35 PM |
#134 |
  -
It is not so much that she is too old in the abstract. It is that Dummya's appointees were so |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:22 PM |
#192 |
 -
Much younger and she wouldn't have enough experience. n/t |
pnwmom |
May-26-09 10:15 AM |
#79 |
  -
How much is enough? At 45, a lawyer could have 20 or more |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:43 PM |
#203 |
 -
Clarence Thomas was woefully underqualified. |
pnwmom |
May-26-09 06:03 PM |
#216 |
 -
I'm 55 -- there's a LOT to be said for it... |
northernlights |
May-26-09 10:54 AM |
#93 |
-
My nose has stopped running with snot years ago. Well maybe like 3 years ago, but that's beside |
Phoonzang |
May-26-09 11:18 AM |
#102 |
-
Realistically, your vote on the SCOTUS is going to be with the right or the left. It |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:57 PM |
#206 |
-
K&R |
Wednesdays |
May-26-09 08:26 AM |
#32 |
-
There's one huge problem with Sotomayor |
MajorChode |
May-26-09 08:46 AM |
#43 |
 -
HUGH DRAWBACK!!11 Impeach Obama - I wanted a METS fan!!1! |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 08:51 AM |
#46 |
  -
Settle only for a Red Sox fan! Yankees!!! Oh no! |
emsimon33 |
May-26-09 09:05 AM |
#53 |
  -
Hey, the radical right takes shit like that seriously! |
DFW |
May-26-09 12:16 PM |
#131 |
  -
She's a Yankees fan? |
gmudem |
May-26-09 02:42 PM |
#167 |
 -
Oh man. I wish I didn't know that! |
JerseygirlCT |
May-26-09 11:29 AM |
#106 |
-
I can't help but think it calls her judgement into question |
MajorChode |
May-26-09 11:45 AM |
#118 |
-
a question |
ronatchig |
May-26-09 08:48 AM |
#44 |
 -
No. I don't think it had been founded yet when she was at Yale, plus she's a Democrat. nt |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 08:52 AM |
#47 |
-
Her time at Yale has nothing to do with it. The Federalist Society is not only for students. It is |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:25 PM |
#193 |
-
Nice, very nice. He had a lot of qualified people to choose from. |
snowdays |
May-26-09 08:48 AM |
#45 |
-
Okay folks.. |
riona |
May-26-09 09:05 AM |
#54 |
-
Very happy with this nomination. |
closeupready |
May-26-09 09:29 AM |
#58 |
-
Another Catholic on the Supreme Court. This makes SIX out of NINE. |
onehandle |
May-26-09 09:33 AM |
#60 |
 -
Not all Catholics are FREAKS. There's such an entity as a "liberal Catholic." |
ShortnFiery |
May-26-09 09:47 AM |
#63 |
  -
Yes, I know. I'm one of them. nt |
onehandle |
May-26-09 09:53 AM |
#66 |
   -
Cool, same here. But under DEEP COVER in my right-wing Parish. |
ShortnFiery |
May-26-09 09:54 AM |
#69 |
  -
It would be better to have a Judge who believes in her own right to |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 10:02 AM |
#71 |
   -
You can be a Catholic and personally "pro-life" without IMPOSING those beliefs on others. |
ShortnFiery |
May-26-09 11:15 AM |
#101 |
    -
Yes, absolutely |
JerseygirlCT |
May-26-09 11:32 AM |
#110 |
    -
You could be . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 01:25 PM |
#154 |
    -
The issue is, will the Pope say you are an obedient Catholic if you are pro-choice? That |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:33 PM |
#198 |
   -
Many, many, many Catholics are |
JerseygirlCT |
May-26-09 11:32 AM |
#109 |
  -
How people self-describe is one thing. What your parish priest and/or the Pope say may |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:37 PM |
#200 |
  -
Well, I'm pretty sure I can guess |
JerseygirlCT |
May-26-09 06:28 PM |
#218 |
  -
Otherwise known as "Catholics destined for Hell." |
sofa king |
May-26-09 12:52 PM |
#141 |
 -
That is a concern... |
Baby Snooks |
May-26-09 09:50 AM |
#64 |
-
I could easily say that Catholics are overrepresented on the Court . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 10:07 AM |
#74 |
 -
He's not perverted... |
Baby Snooks |
May-26-09 11:37 AM |
#115 |
-
Well, since Catholics as a whole voted for Obama by 53%, we're not all RW antichoicers |
WildEyedLiberal |
May-26-09 02:57 PM |
#170 |
-
I like it! I like her. :-) NT |
ShortnFiery |
May-26-09 09:46 AM |
#62 |
-
Let the republic slimeballs try to politically invalidate her |
NBachers |
May-26-09 10:06 AM |
#73 |
-
so we let them have TWO RIGHT WING NUTS |
iamthebandfanman |
May-26-09 10:09 AM |
#75 |
-
Anyone taking bets on a successful Republican blockage of this appointment? |
Ezlivin |
May-26-09 10:09 AM |
#77 |
 -
I disagre |
dana_b |
May-26-09 10:18 AM |
#82 |
 -
Nope, even the party of no can't try to block a centrist hispanic woman and |
digidigido |
May-26-09 10:18 AM |
#83 |
  -
Damn. I hope so! |
Ezlivin |
May-26-09 10:22 AM |
#85 |
 -
Couldn't we take THEIR idea and go "nuclear" on them? |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 10:56 AM |
#95 |
-
Democrats did not fillibuster judicial appointments. I am not sure |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 05:00 PM |
#207 |
-
Actually the Rethugs did do so for one of LBJ's appointments (Abe Fortas)... |
cascadiance |
May-26-09 07:55 PM |
#224 |
-
Not pleased with this pick, not pleased with Obama. |
ooglymoogly |
May-26-09 10:17 AM |
#80 |
 -
I understand your rant, agree with much, but respectfully disagree |
digidigido |
May-26-09 10:26 AM |
#87 |
  -
I think most of the country is center and left of center, not right. (And thanks again, Bush Cheney |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 04:50 PM |
#205 |
 -
Who is your choice? And, |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 11:51 AM |
#119 |
  -
DU posters do not have the staff and outside |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 05:10 PM |
#210 |
  -
I am not in the loop for choosing a Justice. |
ooglymoogly |
May-26-09 09:25 PM |
#227 |
 -
She is very pro-gay. |
closeupready |
May-26-09 12:00 PM |
#123 |
-
That is good news. |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 05:13 PM |
#211 |
-
link please, proof please. nt |
ooglymoogly |
May-26-09 09:27 PM |
#228 |
-
I don't have a link. |
closeupready |
May-26-09 09:43 PM |
#229 |
-
A link I saw yesterday |
Adelante |
May-27-09 10:42 AM |
#234 |
-
C-Span is running a "Moot Court" where Sotomayer participated . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-26-09 10:17 AM |
#81 |
-
congratulations to SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Sonia Sotomayor |
livefreest |
May-26-09 10:23 AM |
#86 |
-
Being that she is from Puertorican background... |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 10:36 AM |
#89 |
 -
she is not from PR. she's from NY |
cali |
May-26-09 10:54 AM |
#94 |
  -
I am familiar with... |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 11:10 AM |
#99 |
 -
It's not that your comment is critical of Obama |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 12:00 PM |
#124 |
  -
If I worked in Fox News |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 12:16 PM |
#132 |
 -
What is your dissenting argument? |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 01:32 PM |
#157 |
 -
I asked for info on her rulings while you used the monotonous meme of... |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 03:20 PM |
#178 |
  -
Start with reading all of Lasher's posts on this thread |
stanwyck |
May-26-09 04:27 PM |
#194 |
 -
What is an argument is that she is a catholic |
ooglymoogly |
May-26-09 09:51 PM |
#230 |
 -
Are you "familiar with" the fact that NYC Puerto Ricans are overwhelmingly Democrats? |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 12:43 PM |
#136 |
 -
Overwhelmingly Democrat is also a generalization |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 01:03 PM |
#148 |
 -
No, it's a statistic |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 01:32 PM |
#158 |
 -
Well... |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 03:04 PM |
#173 |
 -
And you happen to be in Florida |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 03:56 PM |
#187 |
 -
What an amazingly useless observation. |
Codeine |
May-26-09 11:30 AM |
#108 |
  -
Racist? |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 11:33 AM |
#111 |
 -
Seems so. Your "analysis" presumes that Bronx Puerto Rican political beliefs are genetic |
HamdenRice |
May-26-09 12:51 PM |
#139 |
 -
That's an extensive "analysis" of a very "meaningless" short statement. |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 01:01 PM |
#146 |
 -
Neither her schools, her genes or her honors tell us whether she is neocon, centrist or |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 05:21 PM |
#212 |
 -
Here is one ruling - on minimum wage for homeless workers |
Adelante |
May-26-09 12:02 PM |
#125 |
  -
Thank you. |
Lost-in-FL |
May-26-09 12:04 PM |
#127 |
  -
Good post! |
superconnected |
May-26-09 05:04 PM |
#209 |
 -
Racial profiling rocks! |
WildEyedLiberal |
May-26-09 08:32 PM |
#226 |
-
So if the naysayers are correct, Senate will not go along. |
RedCloud |
May-26-09 11:30 AM |
#107 |
 -
The nomination is his call and the likelihood is that a Democratic Senate will |
No Elephants |
May-26-09 05:25 PM |
#213 |
-
Too moderate? |
Wabbajack_ |
May-26-09 11:36 AM |
#113 |
-
So far so good |
hangman86 |
May-26-09 11:39 AM |
#116 |
-
A Great Day for Latinos |
Mosaic |
May-26-09 11:40 AM |
#117 |
-
nice. good pick. |
La Lioness Priyanka |
May-26-09 11:59 AM |
#122 |
-
Obama has the repubs by the balls with this pick. |
craigmatic |
May-26-09 12:16 PM |
#130 |
 -
How much of the Latino votes do they now hold? |
Lone_Star_Dem |
May-26-09 01:07 PM |
#151 |
-
I'm so glad we voted for a President that would nominate |
Creideiki |
May-26-09 12:32 PM |
#133 |
-
Let the Obstruction Begin!!! |
kevsters |
May-26-09 12:46 PM |
#138 |
 -
All part of the game. In the end we will have a moderate female member to the SC. n/t |
wisteria |
May-26-09 01:03 PM |
#149 |
-
I love it that she came up from poverty and is a self made woman! |
earcandle |
May-26-09 12:51 PM |
#140 |
-
How long before |
The Wizard |
May-26-09 12:53 PM |
#142 |
-
I like this pick. It will give the Republicans a chance to hurt themselves VERY BADLY, |
Jim Sagle |
May-26-09 12:59 PM |
#144 |
-
Ron Kuby said he's never won an appeal in her court. He says she's tough |
alfredo |
May-26-09 01:01 PM |
#147 |
-
Looks like a pretty safe choice.......... |
Joe the Liberal |
May-26-09 01:40 PM |
#159 |
-
This pick is probably as less-harmful to progressive values as could be expected from this |
T Wolf |
May-26-09 01:46 PM |
#160 |
-
Solid choice |
Prophet 451 |
May-26-09 02:12 PM |
#162 |
-
good pick, Obama |
katty |
May-26-09 02:51 PM |
#169 |
-
K&R |
HOLOS |
May-26-09 04:43 PM |
#204 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-26-09 05:29 PM |
#214 |
-
"Too Dumb Sotomayor" the Neocons accuse? From the Party of Dumb GWB |
troubledamerican |
May-26-09 08:19 PM |
#225 |
-
I'm not stoked for this either |
downeyr |
May-27-09 08:35 PM |
#236 |