You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: The NTSB won't have information on airspace incursions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. The NTSB won't have information on airspace incursions
Since it primarily keeps records regarding aircraft mishaps. Airspace violations are handled by the FAA. In this case, neither the FAA nor the NTSB would have any jurisdiction.

I've been flying for 15 years, however. The comment about GPS not being foolproof is spot-on. Many aircraft don't navigate with GPS at all, and some use INS with GPS corrections (like the C-130, which both the Dutch and the US fly out of Curacao). Despite the general conception among the public that military aircraft are the absolute most advanced, that's not always true. Most of the advances are weapon systems and other technologies used in the aircraft employment, not in the navigation systems.

I've flown the C-130E, C-130H and C-130J (the Dutch operate the C-130H as well). The E and H models still have a human navigator, and the aircraft has a dual INS system that's updated with a GPS receiver (the whole unit is called SCNS, or Self-Contained Navigation System). But SCNS is only as good as the human navigator and I've had occasions of the Nav turning me in the wrong direction or getting lost altogether.

The C-130J has a more advanced INS/GPS system called an EGI, but it's still not as accurate as a stand-alone GPS unit certified for GPS navigation. Those systems have an RNP of 3 (Required Navigation Performance), while the "advanced" C-130J is certified for RNP-10. I'm quite sure the Dutch C-130Hs aren't any better.

Of curious note, the Venezuelan press release did not state what kind of aircraft it was...the Dutch operate combat aircraft like the F-16, but it's highly unlikely F-16s would be located in Curacao since they have limited range in the first place and they are all primarily stationed out of the Netherlands. The Dutch also operate the C-130H as stated before, plus the KDC-10 tanker, and numerous other support aircraft.

Chances are, if it was something like a C-130, it wouldn't have nearly the sensationalism being a non-combat military aircraft, versus implying that it was a fighter or something. My unit used to deploy assets to Curacao...there were no combat coded aircraft there. They were all transports, patrol aircraft or there with the USAF crews (like my friends) that were involved in the counter drug effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC