You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Not the only one. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Tamyrlin79 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not the only one.
Most Amendments, since at least the 18th Amendment (though they skipped it on the 19th Amendment and picked back up on #20), have had a seven year time limit imposed on it for ratification. So, you are wrong to be cynical about this particular amendment being "the only amendment in our history with a deadline for passing by the states." This is WRONG WRONG WRONG! Look at nearly every amendment since the 18th, and it is there in black and white, some provision, like so, from the 18th Amendment:

Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several states, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the states by the Congress.


The reason is a court case (though I can't recall to cite) that arose as to whether a state could still ratify an old amendment or whether, after a certain time, that amendment had effectively expired. The Court essentially held that, since the Constitution didn't impose a time limit, that Amendments could be considered indefinitely until ratified. In response, the legislature (Congress) started including a time limit provision on all amendments, such that now the standard, accepted time limit is seven years from the date of passage. I wish they'd just pass a Time Limit Amendment setting it to seven years for all future amendments so they wouldn't have to keep pasting the same clauses into all future amendments (it is quite repetitive at this point), but that's where things stand on the issue as of now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC