I think nobody will disagree with me when I say that Dean is a fundraising machine compared to the other candidates in the present field.
How much weight should such a quality have when considering a candidate? Let us say Dean is hypothetically less "electable" than Clark or Kerry (as recent polls indicate). Would his ample stash of funds compensate for this deficit or would it be wiser to stick with a candidate with less money but broader appeal to the general American citizenry?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
