You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Dean putting power in the hands of the people, really? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:06 PM
Original message
Is Dean putting power in the hands of the people, really?
Advertisements [?]
I think this is worth debating, so stick with me for a second before you hit reply and accuse me of flame-baiting and knee-jerk Dean bashing.

I just read MGKrebs's post which says: "I think the Dean "mania" is as much about the empowerment we have been given through the internet driven campaign as it is about him." This is a common sentiment people repeat in defense of Dean's campaign. Some say that that sense of empowerment is MORE important than Dean's politics.

Now, I aslo read Maired's post today which says: "Dean isn't planning on making any substantive changes...Find something among his policies that is going to change the direction in which wealth flows. There isn't one.

He's not going to cut the obscene war-industry budget...He's not going to take the hands of the wealthy elites out of our pockets on healthcare. Instead he's actually planning to give them $88G MORE per year while still leaving 10M people without healthcare. He's not going to end the drugs war, which means that while, if he follows through, he's going to switch some money out of the prison industry, he's just going to funnel into the same elite pockets via the healthcare industry...He says he's going to balance the budget. But on whose backs? Obviously not the wealthy elites' backs, so guess whose backs that leaves!
(I added my own comment to this post which noted that Dean's education plan is actually a government subsidy to the banks which give out higher education loans...so the list of policies which relate to wealth transfers is long, I think.)

It has always been my feeling that that wealth transfer is the bottom line when it comes to politics. Republicans would be all for abortion and gay marriage and they'd hate christian fundementalists if they could figure out a way to turn those issues into policies which shifted wealth and power to the wealthiest. And I wonder, how empowered are the people when they're empowering someone who isn't really interested in channeling ECONOMIC power down to the middle and working class?

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC