Joe Lieberman says Howard Dean is wrong to say that the world is not safer now that Saddam has been captured. How is the world safer? Iraq may be better off but I do not know if it is "safer"? If Saddam was a threat to us and the world, as Joe Lieberman seemed to think, then I guess it could be argued that the world is safer, but I don't think he was as big a threat as what will take his place - not only in Iraq but in other countries of the Middle East. Israel will not be safer either without Saddam.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
