http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1242664#1242753I am disappointed Chávez met with Mugabe, and calling him a "freedom fighter", since there's nothing farther from the truth.
AP thinks Mugabe should be supporter because he is "fighting neoliberalism". I don't agree...
"You are either with us or against us"... I don't agree with * when he says it, I don't agree with AP either. I don't believe you can comprise when human rights violations are taking place.
You say... "Regardless, you can bet your bottom dollar that any human rights violations Mugabe is accused of (or guilty of, for that matter) would be completely ignored and/or dismissed in the corporate media if he toed the appropriate line."
Yes, probably. Does that make the human rights violations any less important? Do you really think that justifies it?
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
