You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: That's my sense of it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. That's my sense of it
VERY weird that His Chimperial Majesty should raise mandatory screening for "mental health" issues at this point.

What is the point of "diagnosing" people?

If he is so fucking "compassionate" about the mentally ill -- why not start with leading on insurance parity for mental illness? Jeepers -- that is a really big problem!

What about starting with all the poor folks who got dropped from publically funded mental health care during Gipper's presidency, some of which became homeless and untreated for sometimes very serious disorders?

If diagnosed by His Chimperial Majesty's program, then what? I agree that it sounds like Big Pharmaa, in the guise of pitifully undertrained med techs, will dispense expensive "one-size-fits-all" meds, and His CHimperial Majesty will crow proudly about what a great success the program is, when in fact there is growing evidence that these drugs, while life-saving when given to the right people, can cause harmful effects in others who were not properly evaluated. Then there's the issue of long-term usage....

The Communist totalitarian history of government lead mental health programs leaps to mind. In USSR and CHina, ideologically driven doctors routinely diagnosed dissidents, who were unable to see that COmmunism was a perfect system of government, were obivously mentally ill, and were sent to re-education camps. While I think that may be kinda a hard sell in the US of today, it's not all that far-fetched. However, in an age where prospective employees are subjected to many humiliations when applying for jobs -- like peeing into cups, having your credit history checked, and your privacy scrutinized -- it sounds as though that the kind of climate His Chimperial Majesty says he will create that will be "favorable to business" (what used to be known as "serfdom" or "indentured slavery"), your boss would LOVE to know if you have any signs of psychiatric disorders. It's yet another form of power over you.

Imagine having a disagreement with your boss, and he or she being able to say, "Well, you *have* been disgnosed with histrionic personality disorder (or whatever), and you need to understand that you are deluded by your illness. It's not your fault, and I have great compassion for you, but fuck you."

Fuck Bush! There ALREADY isn't enough care for people ALREADY diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. There is ALREADY abuse and bullying of people with psychiatric disorders in society, even within the mental health field.

I see enormous red flags flying all over the place on this initiative. There is some hidden agenda. Beware.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC