Reply #14: Conason confuses me. He's really really harsh on Nader.

[AP]

I'm harsh on Nader, but Conason makes me cringe when he's harsh on Nader, and I think it was Conason who had the article in the Guardian defending the BBC (and I know plenty of people here defend the BBC, but there's actually a really subtle debate there which Conason doesn't seem to understand), and now this.

I loved The Hunting of the President and have accepted it all as neutrally reported fact, but when I read things like this it makes me wonder if I should rethink my take on his books (ie, accept that one or two passages might be spin).

And of all people, Conason should appreciate that a guy at the same place Clinton was at in Sep 91 could win this.