Reply #51: By not answering the points I raised in my previous post

[Feanorcurufinwe]

you are just continuing the same pattern.

You continue to malign me by saying my "motivation ... isn't to discuss issues".

But you avoid every issue I raise.

I care about America and I care about the Democratic party. I believe it is healthy for our party to hold our leaders to the highest standards of integrity. Avoiding questions about the candidates by questioning the motivations of the questioner doesn't help anybody.

Have I ever called a posting at DU bullshit? lol Yeah, read, that post. A Dean supporter posts a thread saying Kerry shouldn't be referred to by his own initials and then insists it has nothing to do with who they support. That is bullshit and anyone can see so. The whole thread was a totally silly non-issue and nothing but bullshit from top to bottom.

As for the other threads you posted, yes, they are critical of Dean. But there are no attacks without references, no mis-quoting, no quoting out of context. Just questions about Dean credibility that have so far gone mostly unanswered and a commentary about his debate tactic that is perfectly valid and referenced.

You say I am not evil, and you say my "motivation ... isn't to discuss issues". So just what do you think my motivation is?

on edit: rereading this, I see all I am doing is defending myself. So I guess you have successfully diverted the discussion from a discussion of the issues -- AGAIN.