You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I'm so glad to hear Dean speak out about NCLB. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm so glad to hear Dean speak out about NCLB.
It's an issue that needs to be dealt with. While I was glad to read his remarks, I don't like some of the language in the petition, so I didn't sign it.

Here is what the petition says:

I want real federal help for education, not rigid and unrealistic federal mandates.

This part is right on target.

I want education policies that will close achievement gaps, not lower standards.

This part is suspect. The whole "higher standards" dogma has been used to decimate public ed. Sort of like a war veteran with PTSD, when I and many teachers hear those words, the shields go up and we get ready to be assaulted. NCLB itself purports to legislate policies in order to close achievement gaps. Great words opening the doors to bad policy.

I do not want schools to “dumb down” their tests just so it can avoid federal penalties.

More key words sending up the shields: "dumb down" and "tests." I want teachers and schools to decide what tests they need to give when to best inform instruction. And I want the state and the feds to keep their non-educator noses and PAC donator pockets out of the whole thing.

I want someone to admit publicly that the "dumb down" rhetoric is full of shit. Pardon me, but it is. When you "raise" so called "standards" (really long laundry lists of isolated skills...not my definition of standards) a year or two higher than the current generations of adults had to achieve, then find out that kids are having trouble cramming in that much that fast, that's not "dumbing down." The only reason to "dumb down" a test is when the legislation behind the test is statistically impossible to achieve. A convenient choice of words.

I want Congress to reform the “No Child Left Behind” Act so that it helps teachers and school administrators, without undermining local control of education.

This is pretty good. "Helping," not "punishing." I personally want NCLB repealed in entirety. The helpful portions can be re-legislated under a new bill that doesn't carry the GWB contamination.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC