You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Supply Side Tripe [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 12:45 PM
Original message
McCain's Supply Side Tripe
Advertisements [?]
In his recent economic proposals, John McCain has proposed the same tired old supply-side B.S. that the Republicans have been spewing for years. This is the idea that tax cuts create such rapid economic growth that they more than make up for their revenue loss.

*Snip*
McCain is in favor of extending the Bush tax cuts, which are set to expire in 2010.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has projected that by extending the cuts, which McCain originally opposed, and including the additional cuts McCain has proposed, the deficit for 2013 would be somewhere around $439 billion to $445 billion.

McCain disputes those figures because "they're static numbers -- not saying that revenues will increase with a strong economy and with low taxes. That's the difference, and I respectfully disagree."
*/Snip*

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/08/mccain/index.html

The truth is completely contrary to what he suggests. The following is government receipts, ex-Social Security taxes though the general results hold almost exactly the same with them as well, during the Clinton years, the George W. Bush Years, and the Reagan years.

Clinton Years
Receipts 1993: $842 billion
Receipts 2001: $1.483 trillion
Growth: 76%

Bush Jr. Years
Receipts 2001: $1.483 trillion
Expected 2009: $ 2.086 trillion
Growth: 40.6%

Reagan Years
Receipts 1981: $469 billion
Receipts 1989: $727 billion
Growth: 55%

Source: Congressional Budget Office

As you can see, Clinton had much faster growth in general government revenues following a tax increase than Bush and Reagan did following tax cuts. This is also even though Bush and Reagan had higher rates of inflation than did Clinton which has the effect of boosting government revenues artificially. None of these results should surprise people, but we need to make the point again and again that supply-side economics is a bunch of B.S. and it has empirically been proven to be as much. This is an ideological debate that we need to have in order to beat McCain in this election, and Republicans in general in future elections. They keep repeating the same tripe McCain said that I pointed out earlier and if it is not refuted, people will begin to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC