You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: It's interesting to note that the fossil fuelophiles kept talking Energy Balance all the time UNTIL [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. It's interesting to note that the fossil fuelophiles kept talking Energy Balance all the time UNTIL
Wang showed that the energy balance for gasoline is actually negative (.81 : 1 ) i.e. for every 1 unit of energy you put into drilling for, transporting and refining the oil you get out .81 units of energy in the final product. For ethanol, the latest figures recorded in studies (2004 time frame) are 1.67 to 1 for a 67% gain (1.77 to 1 - for dry mill plants, which the majority of ethanol plants now being built are). And Wang has stated the latest ethanol plants are turning in numbers of over 1.9 to 1. So now some fossil fuelophiles don't want to talk about net energy balance anymore.

Actually, Dr. Wang has always said JUST using Net Energy Balance alone is not so useful as there are more aspects to the use of a fuel - such as GHG emmissions. Ethanol releases less GHGs than gasoline and as less fossil fuel is used in the farming and producion of ethanol this will only improve.

from a report by Michael Wang:

"Though self evaluation of ethanol’s energy balance is easy to understand, it may not be useful to fully understand true energy benefits of fuel ethanol. A more complete way is to compare fuel ethanol with the fuels to be displaced by ethanol (i.e., gasoline). GHG emissions were simply ignored in some debatable studies."

AND as ethanol production uses less and less fossil fuels the GHG reduction numbers for ethanol will keep improving. As farmers learn they can use less nitrogen fertilizer, the GHG numbers for ethanol will only improve (fossil fuel is used in making nitrogen fertilizers). Iowa farmers reduced their usage of Nitrogen fertilizer by 16% and maintained or improved their yields compared to neighboring states farmers.

Other current developments include the application of ultra-sound to the ethanol production process (ultra-sound applied to the corn slurry before the fermentation stage produces much smaller particle size) results in a 30% gain in alcohol yield. Future ethanol plants will incorporate this in there designs.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC