Reply #57: Because I have a strong distaste for

[gravity556]

Anyone who would deprive a citizen a right without due process of law. Which means that you have to be adjudicated by a court to be ruled incompetent and made a prohibited posessor. I like ALL of my rights. I don't like it when someone who knows nothing about firearms, to include their use, the legalities surrounding them as well as the history of armed citizenry. Not to mention that your constant spamming of the board with your vapid "musings" "Hey guys, what if we make all guns have to be pink!" and your previously stated in one of your forum spamming blog posts, you came right the fuck out and said that disarming law abiding citizens was your fucking GOAL, since you knew that criminals don't fucking follow the laws.

So yes, that put you on my "fool with delusions of grandeur and no regard for civil rights" list. I dislike what you say because you would see me disarmed and left to the tender mercies of whoever is bigger and stronger than I am and decides they want to assault or rob me.

And I still didn't insult you-only your ideas. The difference between us is that while you have no qualms about violating my right to defend myself using the most effective means available to me, I would never dream of trying to violate your first amendment rights. I'll call bullshit when I see it, but if you can't handle an opposing view that is strongly held and defended, maybe blogging out in the wild isn't for you.