Reply #63: Of course I've played pool.

[petgoat]

Flight 175 was aimed at the Post Office. Are you maintaining that it
knocked pieces of broken core column into WTC7?

Here's the path of the fuselage according to Don Paul.



Here's the damage to the core columns according to NIST:




Are you maintaining that 767 debris made it through that forest of
core columns and hit WTC7? I don't believe that photos of the N side
of WTC2 show any exit wound consistent with that trajectory, and NIST
shows no perimeter column damage consistent with that. Had a landing gear
or an engine been found in the WTC7 rubble, don't you think someone would
have photographed it?

You guys make unwarranted assumptions supportive of the official story
to protect your complacency. I did the same thing until confronted
with the facts.

Doesn't it seem strange that we get only one landing gear and one
engine, and we don't know whether they were port or starboard? I'd kind
of like to know.