Reply #37: Is public debunking of 9/11 bullshit a good thing or not?

[greyl]

On the one hand, you expect credit to be given to the CT side for being the first to debunk Loose Change, and on the other you want to be able to criticize those who publicly debunk Loose Change(and others). Those premises contradict each other.

If you want to claim that media coverage is responsible for the millions of downloads of LooseChange, you'll have to include the 9/11 Press for Truth website in your list of those to blame because they linked to it as recently as 6 weeks ago.

I first heard of LooseChange in this forum from CTists who were spreading the link, and I'd bet that the overwhelming majority of those who believe Loose Change heard about from someone else who believed it.

For whatever reason, the guys you link to at 911research.wtc7.net didn't have enough influence, nor have they kept up with every new version of LooseChange.