You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Decision is difficult, but 9/11 could not happen without their approval [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
DrDebug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. Decision is difficult, but 9/11 could not happen without their approval
Dick Cheney may appear to be very powerful, but Rockefellers, Orange-Nassuas and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsors do and always will outrank him. If they didn't approve, it could not have happened, since their economical and political power is far more extensive than a mere Vice President of the United States.

Queen Elizabeth is a member of the most powerful clan in the world and is still the Queen of the World. Not only are they ultimately owner of four countries (United Kingdom, Belgium, Portugal, Sweden); if you don't believe me, read the constitution/laws of the countries and it specially says that they are the country and democracy exists by the grace of the King, but they have to sign all laws into effect, approve of every government and are untouchable, ie. they do not abide with the law they create. This makes the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsors the real rulers of the world especially since all roads lead to London, and nothing happens without the approval and consent of the elite in London who still consider the United States as one of their territories and not the other way around.

Queen Beatrix is a member of the second most powerful royal clan in the world. They "only" own two countries: The Netherlands, Luxembourg, but unlike their rival clan, they have enormous wealth which is such that Fortune 500 was forced to degrade her from her richest woman in the world position without providing any evidence explaining why she is not the richest woman in earth. Her grandmother owned 51% of Royal Dutch Oil which merged with Shell at 60/40% and that provided the Oranges with 30% of Shell. Shell still refuses to disclose the percentage of ownership of their stockholders and she is still listed as the largest stockholder. Even if the percentage is significant lower, the wealth could not have disappeared, and the second largest corporation in the world is their property.

The Orange-Nassaus are not really a royal family, since they crowned themselves (The Saudi royals also crowned themselves BTW), they were dukes of Orange in France. Look at a map of France and get yourself a magnifying glass, because it's just an insignificant small town. During the Congress of Vienna in 1815, it was the elite families who redrew the map of Europe after the defeat of Napolean. The Netherlands was given to the Oranges, Sweden (family of the British royalty) could take Norway, the Russian emperor could grab Finland and Poland, the Papal States were returned to the pope, and most of Germany were given to the Dukes and Princes of the so-called noble families as well. Henry Kissinger wrote his doctoral dissertation about this event and he considered it a great event, because the elite blatently ignored democracy and just carved up everything among themselves and even crowned some of the peers royals.

The Rockefellers are exactly the same and they own so much oil that any decision about oil is taken by that family. Ronald Reagan didn't like George H.W. Bush and had no intention whatsoever of selecting Bush as his Vice President. Ronald Reagan had a meeting with David Rockefeller (Tarpley, Unauthorized biography) and he was simply told that if he did not select George H.W. Bush as Vice President then he would make sure that Ronald Reagan could not get elected or hold any political position, and it was therefore David Rockefeller who selected George H.W. Bush as Vice President, and it is the Rockefellers who started all this Bush crap.

So please explain why the above listed families are not relevant, because even though you don't see them make any decisions, it is clear that their power is immense and global. And if Bush is on his tours, he has to meet with them and not the other way around. If they want to discuss a matter with George Bush then Bush has to come to them. Nothing has changed for the past centuries and the same groups are still firmly in control, and the so called democracy is merely intended to keep the population happy and hides the real decision makers in this world.

Lyndon LaRouche may have started a cult of personality, and is bordering on the far right, however I have yet to see his conclusions proven wrong. Please notice all the banks who had pre-knowledge in 9/11 which is exactly what Lyndon has been saying for years: it is the international bankers together with elite families who one layer above the governments. I do not doubt the correctness of his research even though I want nothing to do with his group and cult of personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC