Reply #129: Steven Jones debunks dustification...

[SidDithers]

A note on pulverization.
Along with others, I examined the sample obtained by Janette
MacKinlay at 113 Liberty Street, just across from the South
Tower. The windows of her apartment were blown in during the
collapse of this tower on 9/11/2001, and her apartment was filled
with dust and debris. She collected a sample of this material in
her own apartment in a plastic bag – which is good procedure –
and the chain of custody went directly from her to me. (In the
presence of other researchers, I collected more samples from her
large plastic bag, while visiting in her home.)
As we examined the WTC-debris sample, we found large
chunks of concrete (irregular in shape and size, one was
approximately 5cm X 3 cm X 3cm) as well as medium-sized pieces
of wall-board (with the binding paper still attached). Thus, the
pulverization was in fact NOT to fine dust, and it is a false
premise to start with near-complete pulverization to fine powder
(as might be expected from a mini-nuke or a “star-wars” beam
destroying the Towers). Indeed, much of the mass of the
MacKinlay sample was clearly in substantial pieces of concrete
and wall-board rather than in fine-dust form.

Emphasis added.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/a/Hard-Evidence-Rebudiates-the-Hypothesis-that-Mini-Nukes-were-used-on-the-wtc-towers-by-steven-jones.pdf

Sid