You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: And they based that entirely on supposed "evidence" of a 4th bullet [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. And they based that entirely on supposed "evidence" of a 4th bullet
as supposedly recorded on a Dictabelt tape. That "evidence" was found to be BS by the National Institutes of Science. That "evidence" has been subsequently falsified by synching video tapes shot that day that prove that motorcycle officer JD McClain was nowhere near the corner of Houston and Elm to record that "shot" being fired. The dictabelt evidence crashes and burns on that fact alone. Officer McLain testified to the HSCA that he was nowhere near that intersection to record a fourth shot. They chose to ignore his eyewitness testimony.

But while we're on the HSCA, read their entire report. They AGREE that Oswald was the shooter. They AGREE with your so-called "magic bullet" theory. They agree with everything in the WCR. The ONLY thing they add is the erroneous conclusion that another gunman fired from the grassy knoll. But the "evidence" they believed to reach that conclusion has been conclusively falsified in the intervening years. It was falsified at the time by the NIS.

You do yourself no favors citing the HSCA, because they agreed with the WCR in every respect. To wit:

The HSCA concluded in its 1979 report that:

Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

The HSCA agreed with the single bullet theory, but concluded that it occurred at a time point during the assassination that differed from any of the several time points the Warren Commission theorized it occurred.

The Department of Justice, FBI, CIA, and the Warren Commission were all criticized for deficient job performance in their subsequent investigations, deficient in revealing to the Warren Commission information available in 1964, and the Secret Service was called deficient in their protection of the President.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC