For the heck of it lets make some speculations. I know you believe these are facts, but in reality it's only speculation at this point.
The warning the Mayor received was 9/11 related. The warning came from someone that had enough knowledge to know that 9/11 was the date the attacks would take place and wanted the Mayor to be protected.
Assuming this is correct.
Now what?
How does this point to some malfeasance from the Bush administration?
How does this strengthen your argument that the attacks were self inflected?
How does this point to LIHOP or MIHOP or any other fanciful HOP's?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
