Example: Here we have a thread about Buchanan revealing that Buchanan is unable/unwillingly to understand the time table of events leading up to Iraq. Suddenly Clark enters the conversation with skewed understanding of everything that Clark has been saying. And then the statement includes a twist to blame Clark supporters in case they should reject the statement with a claim based on pure supposition.
Fini. A Clark bash with a stopper for any rebutal.
The next step in the process is usually a pile of junk cherry picked links/quotes meant to draw people into a useless discussion. I'm not biting.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
