You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What happened to Universal Health Care? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Neo-wobbly Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:44 AM
Original message
What happened to Universal Health Care?
Advertisements [?]
We thought we had it; from Hillary "Champion of Health Care" Clinton, to Barack "Change" Obama, Universal Health Care was on the agenda, and there is no way that any Republican could beat that platform against their disastrous handling of the last 7 years.

But wait! The old saying that when things are too good to be true, they usually are, still holds, and wouldn't you know it, the shoe-in winners of the worst landslide victory in a generation don't seem to be landsliding; even the best scenarios show either candidate in a statistical dead heat with McCain. How can this be?

I would like to humbly suggest that twisting the term "Universal Health Care" to mean "mandatory purchase of private insurance" is, and I know this is a stretch, the stupidest thing the Democratic Party has done since they let Ford pardon Nixon.

This is the attitude the Republicans are supposed to have, not Democrats; this is a sop to the insurance companies, and all the rhetoric about "affordable premiums" are just whitewash. What's affordable to a family already having to choose between heating their house and putting food on the table? What good are tax credits to people who don't pay taxes because they don't make any money? And how would they pay for it in the first place?!

No, they have run out in front of a popular movement, and led it into a brick wall, and their policies on Iraq, education, and everything else are the same way: Orwellian doublespeak to hide the fact that they are opposing what they claim to support.

If this were not the case, then why aren't either of the candidates up in arms over the latest news: Hillary went nuclear over a cheap shot at Chelsea, but why isn't she also outraged that the Supreme Court ruled that a woman can't sue her employer for sexual assault and rape because her contract stated that she would go through "arbitration" (her employer picks the arbitrator!)? Obama has stated that the Supreme Court was wrong in their ruling against an integrated school district, but why hasn't he said anything about their rejection of an ACLU lawsuit over illegal wiretapping?

The fact is, neither of them will do anything that would upset their corporate owners campaign contributors, and that means anything that would help you or me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC