You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: I just highly disagree... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I just highly disagree...
If Hillary is so strong, then my question always becomes, why is she behind.

She had no money in the kitty because she wasted it with arrogance. In fact, Obama has only outspent her by about a half million dollars so far. That's a drop in the bucet compared to what both, or each individually for that matter, have spent this entire campaign season.

Hillary was far from financially hamstrung, she did a lousy job at managing her money.

The longer this drags out, the more that poll will change for both candidates. Right now they have Hillary winning Florida, but like I said, if McCain picks Crist as his running mate, you might as well write off Florida this election, and then (and again I use the polling I provided above) Hillary loses the GE.

Facts are facts, Obama will not take the VP slot. Hillary supporters want it, but it will not happen. Michelle has already stated she would not go through this again if he loses this time. Most of it has to do with their children, which is a subject she has been unbending on. She doesn't want her children to go through this mess again, and she knows the odds of a second place finisher in a primary has no shot in the Democratic party of winning the nomination the second time around. You have to go all the way back to 1892 and Grover Cleveland to find a Democrat who accomplished such a feat.

In the face of modern politics, that isn't going to change. Even our VP's get shut out, in fact, only Democrat has ever had one VP elected to President, and that was FDR and Harry S Truman, and Truman wasn't even his original VP, Henry Wallace was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC