You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #128: Interplay of corporate agendas and "lazy journalism" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #127
128. Interplay of corporate agendas and "lazy journalism"
Even without remarking on Clark's surprisingly populist agenda, corporate interests had less "hooks into" Clark than they do with most other Democrats. Clark never had to depend on raising money from special interests to get anywhere in his life. They had no track record to determine how pliable Clark might be in different situations, since he hasn't held any public office. That doesn't mean that they were sure Clark would be more dangerous to their interests than some other perfectly respectable liberal Democrat might be, for example. It does mean that Clark was a relatively free agent, and an unknown, and business in general hates unknown quantities. They can plan for any specific disaster, but they are control freaks at heart. Clark's relative independence scares them in my opinion.

As for "lazy journalism", it is one part of the "dumbing of America" that I really really hate. Look at what has happened to news coverage over the last decade. More and more it is an extension of media entertainment divisions. Everything is increasingly by formula, with tried and true plot lines that are played on endlessly, the way "hit songs" are recycled forever. Coverage of politics has increasingly devolved into Sports coverage. It's like the way the Olympics are covered. Before a single muscle has been flexed, the media already knows who they will focus on. They pump up the competition between a battle scarred veteran holding onto glory vs. the up and coming young Turk, for example (that's one of their favorite plot lines). They pre can Bio spots on both, and then they go on endlessly about their competition as if they were the only two athletes in the world competing in that one event.

The media tried out two simple story lines for the Primaries, in progression, which actually is twice as many as usual so maybe I shouldn't complain (NOT). Dean Dean Dean was the first, and guess what the second one was? Yup, "the competition between a battle scarred veteran holding onto glory vs. the up and coming young Turk", in other words, Kerry vs. Edwards. What, was anyone else running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC