Reply #2: Thanks for posting. No doubt

[ProSense]

that Kerry learned a few lessons from the 2004 media ambush. His 2004 Convention speech was well received.

The media simply refuses to acknowledge their complicity. They would rather try to hide and pretend something else happened. Given that most of them commented on his 2004 speech, why are they all acting surprised that he can deliver an effective and passionate speech? In 2006, Kerry gave a speech that reintroduced the word dissent into the debate. In fact, McCain trying to capitalize on the chatter gave a speech suggesting "we should argue."


There's a word missing in the OP text:

"Yeah, we could have done a better job at making certain that we absolutely murdered those attacks."