You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Whether it's a bluff or not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
35. Whether it's a bluff or not
It's going to piss off the moderates if they are forced to filibuster. I quite like Obama's style and method of negotiating so far. He is just what we need right now - an excellent diplomat who just might manage to bring more unity to the two political parties than we have had in a long time (if ever).

Another thing that runs through my mind here - when the republicans have a majority (as they likely will, at some future date) we're entirely likely to face the same issue they're facing now. In fact we have, on numerous occasions over the last eight years. I vaguely recall from reading "The Audacity of Hope" that we came quite close to cutting out filibusters entirely. Has anyone else considered what the end result of that would be? All well and good when we're the majority perhaps, but not when the ball is in the other court.

Right now, for them, it's either a good bluff or a last resort if forced to it.

I'd prefer to see more open debate between republicans and democrats regarding various ideas, debates that could ultimately reach some kind of conclusion.

Yes, the Bush/Cheney led neocon agenda has fucked us for years, but if we in turn treat them (the right) with the same disregard and contempt with which we have been treated, it's going to ultimately result in yet another cycle of endless bickering resulting in very little productivity.

The more we strive for unity, in the public eye and in private, the greater our chances are of eventually getting things done. Yes it's going to require sacrifices and no we're not going to enjoy or at all agree with some of what is said and done.

Yet I really believe in Obama's goals of unity and cooperation, the idea that, regardless of being largely idealistically opposed, we can make common cause for the good of the many. If he - and by extension we, can successfully negotiate with the other side to bring about positive change, it will be tremendously inspiring and productive.

Time will tell, but at the moment we have the upper hand - and in my view that's the time for healing the breach as much as we can. For clearly demonstrating that we're willing to extend an open hand rather than a closed fist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC