You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: But they have no disagreement on whether... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. But they have no disagreement on whether...
...it was 'right' to attack Iraq or whether to stay there. The Republican's official position is whatever the leader of their party says it is. Democrats don't seem to have a leader...or not one willing to stand up and speak for the party.

But you're deflecting from the issue. What's the DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S position on Iraq, social security and church/state? I'll bet that you can't answer it because the party has no official positions on these issues...or at least nothing they've committed themselves to as a party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC