You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Once and for all - why Kerry lost! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LTRS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 03:03 PM
Original message
Once and for all - why Kerry lost!
Advertisements [?]
The minute we choose a candidate based on his war record instead of his voting record we lost! Period. Kerry voted for most of Bush's controversial programs, and wussed out on speaking against the ones he didn't vote for, long before he became a candidate.

We lost because the messaging sucked and sucked badly (when oh when will they fire the horrible consultants that run this party?), but more importantly we lost because Kerry had a recent history of voting not on principle but on what he thought would get him the most votes in a planned run for president a year later, and the Bushies exploited the hell out of that.

Kind of hard to explain to voters why Bush was wrong on tax cuts, NCLB, the patriot act, the Iraq war, ad nausuem, when you voted FOR all that stuff as a senator (probably because you thought if you didn't you couldn't run for president and capture the middle). Except surprise, there is NO MIDDLE anymore, and your base and what is left of the middle thinks you're just a con job, because you caved and didn't stand up for your principles when it counted.

Kerry lost because they tagged him as an unprincipled flip flopper, and in the year previous to the election when he was calculating, but not yet running for president, he was one.

Now he is one of only 2 voting against Rice. So is that just another political calculation on his part to fire up the base -- he's running again in 2008 -- or is he getting back to his core principles? We can't possibly know. And neither can the voters. Which is why, if nominated, he will lose again in 2008.

The constant calibration gets old. Very old. The public isn't as stupid as people think -- maybe about policy, but not about seeing the core values of a man. And time and time again they will opt for the agenda they disagree over a lack of principles if those are the choices. Every damn time.

Until our politicians and "consultants" finally get that, we will be wandering in the wilderness, hostage to the rethug's destruction of our country.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC