You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: South Carolina isn't worth it for Hillary to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. South Carolina isn't worth it for Hillary to
attack Edwards, she needs to take a longer view. Attacking Edwards won't help her win South Carolina so there is no benefit. Going after the 3rd place guy is a losing strategy, when you are pretty much tied for first or a bit ahead. If she does attack Edwards, I really don't see too many Edwards supporters going for her. If she leaves Edwards alone and he drops out, she will get a greater share of his supporters than otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC