You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: K&R [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R
Important issue. Gay rights now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Want some idea why many gays are pissed at Obama, read this dsc  Oct-26-09 04:25 PM   #0 
  - I must have missed all the other posts that expressed outrage.....  stray cat   Oct-26-09 04:46 PM   #1 
  - there have been several of the years of this case  dsc   Oct-26-09 04:54 PM   #2 
  - What a sad, sick world we live in. And yeah, I'm gonna post this:  Zenlitened   Oct-26-09 06:50 PM   #3 
  - Knee Jerk Bullshit meter goes to 8.7 after readin this "Holder chose to ignore Kerry’s efforts.(AP)"  uponit7771   Oct-26-09 07:19 PM   #4 
  - The man is the AG, he has had this case for several months, and Kerry directly appealed to him  dsc   Oct-26-09 07:22 PM   #5 
     - If post #41 is correct then there was really nothing AG Holder could do.  vaberella   Oct-27-09 01:48 AM   #60 
        - He could have let him in on humanitarian grounds  dsc   Oct-27-09 05:44 AM   #66 
           - Are we forgetting denied asylum?  vaberella   Oct-27-09 07:16 AM   #69 
  - .. Goodling's Partisan Hiring .. (2007)  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:33 PM   #6 
  - that is certainly problematic and might well have been determantive here  dsc   Oct-26-09 07:46 PM   #10 
     - I don't think any one detail is likely to be determinative. The politicization of  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:57 PM   #14 
  - Reunite this family (Boston Globe editorial 2007)  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:38 PM   #7 
  - S.424: Uniting American Families Act of 2009  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:41 PM   #8 
  - H.R.1024: Uniting American Families Act of 2009  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:43 PM   #9 
  - Obama is the only President that is expected to review and make an opinion on  Thrill   Oct-26-09 07:46 PM   #11 
  - Not all  dsc   Oct-26-09 07:47 PM   #12 
     - You should be pissed at Holder not the President  Thrill   Oct-26-09 07:58 PM   #15 
        - It doesn't take a ton of advice to figure this out  dsc   Oct-26-09 08:07 PM   #16 
        - *YOU* should be pissed as well  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 10:00 PM   #38 
  - Treatment by the US of asylum seekers has been screwed up for as long as I can remember  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 07:52 PM   #13 
  - Another thread where "liberals" are blaming the gay community  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 08:24 PM   #17 
  - It happens a lot around here. n/t  QC   Oct-26-09 08:41 PM   #19 
  - Primarily in GD-P  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 08:45 PM   #20 
     - It must surely be the purest coincidence. n/t  QC   Oct-26-09 09:28 PM   #30 
  - Reeks of desperation.  Zenlitened   Oct-26-09 09:03 PM   #23 
  - Who's blaming who?  boppers   Oct-26-09 09:56 PM   #37 
  - Excuse me  dbmk   Oct-27-09 08:44 AM   #77 
  - Interesting. The "liberal" bigots are unreccing this.  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 08:28 PM   #18 
  - there's a cadre of unrecommenders but they don't just target these issues  CreekDog   Oct-27-09 05:11 PM   #97 
  - People get denied asylum all the time  SpartanDem   Oct-26-09 08:51 PM   #21 
  - they wouldn't even have to ask for asylum if they weren't gay  dsc   Oct-26-09 08:53 PM   #22 
     - So how's Nadler's Respect for Marriage Act of 2009 doing?  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 09:11 PM   #26 
     - I think we have a better shot at the uniting families act  dsc   Oct-26-09 09:12 PM   #27 
        - I don't really have a feel for the issue, since I've never been able to understand  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 09:45 PM   #34 
     - residency due to marriage is not garunteed nor immediate  mkultra   Oct-26-09 10:57 PM   #44 
     - that is just plain false  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:58 AM   #64 
        - perhaps you are mistaken  mkultra   Oct-27-09 10:19 AM   #80 
           - the Brazillian was female and to my knowledge no  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:12 PM   #91 
              - doesnt asylum only pertain to those under threat by their native government?  mkultra   Oct-27-09 05:47 PM   #103 
                 - which is my precise point  dsc   Oct-27-09 05:56 PM   #105 
                    - im strill trying to understand your point frankly  mkultra   Oct-28-09 10:56 PM   #119 
                       - He applied for asylum because he was entitled to it  dsc   Oct-28-09 11:03 PM   #120 
                          - so are you saying the rejection of asylum was based in bigotry?  mkultra   Oct-28-09 11:23 PM   #122 
                             - I am saying the fact he had to apply for asylum as opposed to just remaining here as the husband  dsc   Oct-29-09 05:33 AM   #124 
                                - Well, i cant disagree that its bigotry but i fail to see how thats obama's fault  mkultra   Oct-29-09 07:59 AM   #125 
     - The key issue is that the USA doesn't see it as a legal marriage  CreekDog   Oct-27-09 05:12 PM   #98 
  - I have a problem with your post. This is NOT a gay issue--or singularly so.  vaberella   Oct-26-09 09:04 PM   #24 
  - This is a legally married couple who but for the fact it is a gay couple  dsc   Oct-26-09 09:07 PM   #25 
  - I read the article. The OP implies Oliveira was seeking asylum BEFORE he was married.  vaberella   Oct-26-09 09:20 PM   #28 
     - If their marriage were recognized, asylum would be irrelevent period  dsc   Oct-26-09 09:25 PM   #29 
        - This is my last post on the topic because you made this personal.  vaberella   Oct-26-09 09:48 PM   #36 
           - If they were an interracial, straight couple, then asylum wouldn't be needed  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:50 AM   #61 
  - I don't think you're getting it  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 10:10 PM   #39 
  - Ahh, understood. That's different from where I was taking the article.  vaberella   Oct-26-09 10:18 PM   #40 
  - could be  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 11:35 PM   #46 
     - Is there a case file? Because if AG Holder upheld the reasoning.  vaberella   Oct-27-09 01:27 AM   #58 
        - Senator Barack Obama voted with the GOP against  Bluenorthwest   Oct-27-09 07:30 AM   #70 
           - Really? Can you give us a link to a roll-call vote? I don't think there ever was a vote  struggle4progress   Oct-27-09 05:47 PM   #104 
           - could you be more specific because im not seeing what your seeing  mkultra   Oct-27-09 09:58 PM   #109 
  - Automatic - really?  dbmk   Oct-27-09 08:39 AM   #75 
     - All excellent questions  HamdenRice   Oct-27-09 08:50 AM   #78 
  - Thank you, vaberella. Very well said.  Number23   Oct-26-09 11:25 PM   #45 
  - This isn't about race  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 11:38 PM   #47 
  - Perhaps you should inform the OP of that.  Number23   Oct-26-09 11:39 PM   #48 
     - Perhaps we should focus on the story  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 11:42 PM   #49 
        - This happens EVERY DAY in countries all over the world.  Number23   Oct-26-09 11:46 PM   #50 
           - If this was a straight couple  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 11:57 PM   #52 
              - From reading more than one article on this  Number23   Oct-27-09 12:05 AM   #53 
                 - As you and I both know  ruggerson   Oct-27-09 12:18 AM   #54 
                    - "Sometimes, it might be fair, sometimes not."  Number23   Oct-27-09 12:25 AM   #55 
                       - If this was the first screw up  ruggerson   Oct-27-09 12:46 AM   #56 
                       - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-27-09 01:00 AM   #57 
                       - As a Senator, Obama voted against the Uniting American  Bluenorthwest   Oct-27-09 07:34 AM   #71 
                          - I wasn't aware of that. If that's the case, that's appalling.  ruggerson   Oct-27-09 09:09 AM   #79 
                          - You probably weren't aware of it because it probably never happened  struggle4progress   Oct-27-09 04:49 PM   #95 
                             - Every single word from that poster should be taken with a HUGE grain of salt  Number23   Oct-27-09 05:18 PM   #100 
                             - As noted above, I'm unaware of the bill coming to a vote  ruggerson   Oct-27-09 06:21 PM   #106 
                                - Feel free to look it up at Thomas. For this year's bills, follow links I've posted in the thread  struggle4progress   Oct-27-09 06:39 PM   #107 
                          - Really? Can you give us a link to a roll-call vote? I don't think there ever was a vote  struggle4progress   Oct-27-09 04:46 PM   #94 
                          - are you lying bluenorthwest?  mkultra   Oct-27-09 10:03 PM   #110 
  - well he did have time  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:54 AM   #62 
  - Very, VERY Well Said.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Oct-27-09 11:47 AM   #84 
  - It also seems to me that...  butterfly77   Oct-27-09 03:26 PM   #89 
     - We're so noisy sometimes  Prism   Oct-27-09 03:49 PM   #90 
        - I will tell what your problem may be..  butterfly77   Oct-27-09 04:37 PM   #93 
           - No, I know what the problem is  Prism   Oct-27-09 05:00 PM   #96 
              - Bullshit! Don't put words in my mouth..  butterfly77   Oct-28-09 04:15 PM   #116 
  - Is There Anything Which Can Be Done for This Couple Now?  PopSixSquish   Oct-26-09 09:33 PM   #31 
  - I am presuming not  dsc   Oct-26-09 09:38 PM   #32 
  - They would benefit if we passed S424/HR1024  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 09:48 PM   #35 
  - What are the Prospects for Passage?  PopSixSquish   Oct-26-09 10:29 PM   #42 
     - Both bills have been in committee since February. Something like a quarter  struggle4progress   Oct-26-09 10:54 PM   #43 
  - Let's hope the ball begins to roll after healthcare is done  ruggerson   Oct-26-09 11:51 PM   #51 
  - K&R  elshiva   Oct-26-09 09:44 PM   #33 
  - Hopefully this story is not over yet  zulchzulu   Oct-26-09 10:21 PM   #41 
  - The first article changes the entire purpose of the argument in post #40.  vaberella   Oct-27-09 01:43 AM   #59 
  - That is baldly false  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:56 AM   #63 
  - That's the whole point of seeking asylum which was denied. n/t  vaberella   Oct-27-09 07:15 AM   #68 
     - And you can show us that straight married people are  Bluenorthwest   Oct-27-09 07:50 AM   #72 
        - First off...what does the conditions of my being in the US have to do with anything.  vaberella   Oct-27-09 08:36 AM   #74 
  - Holder could address the issue like others who have gotten asylum from Brazil  zulchzulu   Oct-27-09 08:40 AM   #76 
  - all either Obama or Holder have to do  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:59 AM   #65 
  - There are a few things fishy about this story. Holder did exactly the right thing.  HamdenRice   Oct-27-09 06:28 AM   #67 
  - I know for a direct fact that you are wrong on virtually all counts  dsc   Oct-27-09 11:16 AM   #81 
     - You seem confused  HamdenRice   Oct-27-09 12:21 PM   #85 
        - Your info. isn't based on all available facts  NotNarrow   Oct-27-09 11:58 PM   #112 
           - Thanks for the background. Well researched and thoughtful.  ruggerson   Oct-28-09 11:15 PM   #121 
  - I would think that his embrace of religious fundamentalism would be enough.  VMI Dem   Oct-27-09 07:52 AM   #73 
  - Dsc, you should know by now  Prism   Oct-27-09 11:30 AM   #82 
  - But the real question is.....  SacredCow   Oct-27-09 03:14 PM   #86 
  - Ponies are mythological creatures  Prism   Oct-27-09 03:24 PM   #88 
  - Excellent post. All too true, sadly.  Zenlitened   Oct-27-09 05:21 PM   #101 
  - But the mechanisms in place were set up by republicans  ecstatic   Oct-27-09 11:45 AM   #83 
  - Let me guess.  Life Long Dem   Oct-27-09 03:20 PM   #87 
  - gee let a white gay poster belittle black causes on here in this way  dsc   Oct-27-09 04:14 PM   #92 
     - I didn't belittle the cause.  Life Long Dem   Oct-27-09 05:18 PM   #99 
        - Who appointed, and at whose pleasure, does Mr. Holder serve  dsc   Oct-27-09 05:26 PM   #102 
  - Ninth Circuit Recognizes Rape Constitutes Persecution on Account of Political Opinion (2004)  struggle4progress   Oct-27-09 08:30 PM   #108 
  - looks like the applicant broke the 180 day rule and fell victim when asylum was not granted  mkultra   Oct-27-09 10:19 PM   #111 
  - My current (unprofessional) understanding is that DOMA moots the 180 day rule  struggle4progress   Oct-28-09 12:41 AM   #113 
  - why is that?  mkultra   Oct-28-09 10:50 PM   #118 
     - Let's be precise. The actual rule is that 180 days illegal presence triggers  struggle4progress   Oct-29-09 01:17 AM   #123 
        - sounds reasonable, now explain how that links to Obama  mkultra   Oct-29-09 08:02 AM   #126 
           - My #6 shows the immigration judge is one of a number of political appointees from the W era  struggle4progress   Oct-29-09 01:13 PM   #127 
  - DOMA makes the 180 day rule irrelevent  dsc   Oct-28-09 04:40 AM   #115 
     - got any links on that  mkultra   Oct-28-09 10:50 PM   #117 
  - thanks for posting  tomm2thumbs   Oct-28-09 01:15 AM   #114 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC