You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The wit and wisdom of Donald Rumsfeld. A look back at last throes. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 09:46 AM
Original message
The wit and wisdom of Donald Rumsfeld. A look back at last throes.
Advertisements [?]
I held on to this summary of Rumsfeld's blatant lying and twisting of facts, as well as his wacky rationalizations from almost a year ago.

Here are some nuggets from this great read at American Progress:

First, his "deny everything and revise history approach:

On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace noted that Rumsfeld, from before the start of the Iraq war, has offered a rosy picture about how the conflict would turn out, leaving most Americans unprepared for the violence that has resulted. Rumsfeld responded to the criticism by saying: "That's false ... I have been very balanced and measured."


Followed by his going to the dictionary to explain what "last throes" and "guerrilla warfare" really mean:

On Fox, Rumsfeld said, "Last throes could be a violent last throe, just as well as a placid or calm last throe. Look it up in the dictionary."

On NBC, he said,"The last throes could be violence, as you well know from a dictionary standpoint." And on ABC, he told host George Stephanopoulos to "look it up."

..... such as when he tried to twist General Abizaid's assertion that Iraq had become a guerrilla war (Rumsfeld: "I have since gone to the dictionary")

.....or when he defended his characterization of the war on terror as a long, hard "slog" (Rumsfeld: "It's not only the Oxford Dictionary's preferred definition, it's mine")


And, the icing on the cake...Rumsfeld lost the yellow legal pad on which he listed, for gwb, the possible pitfalls of going into Iraq.
Well, except, possibly, for one little item which didn't seem to make the list.
:shrug:

"I presented the president a list of about 15 things that could go terribly, terribly wrong before the war started: the fact that the oil fields could have been set aflame like they were in Kuwait, the fact that we could have had mass refugees and dislocations and it didn't happen, the bridges could have blown up, there could have been a Fortress Baghdad with a moat around it with oil in it and people fighting to the death.… So a great many of the bad things that could have happened did not happen." Rumsfeld can't recall, however, if he told President Bush that there might be an "robust insurgency": "I don't remember if that was on there," Rumsfeld told Tim Russert.


Fortress Baghdad with a moat around it with oil in it? You just can't make this stuff up. MKJ

link to the terrific article:
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=851941


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC