Reply #41: we're "rabidly jumping to her defense" because she didn't say "fucker"...

[progdonkey]

Why is that so difficult to understand? The line is "Focker." She said, "Focker," and you keep declaring that she said "fucker" just so you can have your little laugh.

It's not even a matter of defending her--I would've LOVED it if she'd actually said "fucker"--but of pointing out that you're just being stubborn and immature to have a cheap laugh. It's one step below hearing "duty" and saying, "Heh, she said 'doody,' heh." At least there the words are actual homonyms. Still, when explained that it was "duty," only an idiot when continue on with "NO, IT'S 'DOODY!' HAHAHA, she said 'doody!'" Here, they even sound different, yet you continue to deny it, just so you can continue on with the laugh.

Maybe you honestly hear it as "fucker," but now just accept that you misheard and that she did not say that. There's no shame in admitting you're hearing something that's not there--the shame is continuing on with it.