You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #58: Hmm. The one who wasn't there: how did his name get brought into it?
[View All]
Nikki Stone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-20-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 58. Hmm. The one who wasn't there: how did his name get brought into it? |
|
No DNA or no usable DNA? (corrupted samples). Were condoms used?
(I'm just trying to get a clear picture. I didn't want to get on the Duke threads because they seemed to be flamefests.)
Does Nifong have a history of manipulating evidence? I can imagine that any case he prosecuted based on DNA is now going to want to appeal.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread