You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #94: Jesus F-in Christ ... The DA is a Concern Troll! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-20-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
94. Jesus F-in Christ ... The DA is a Concern Troll!
This case fits that mold. Many of the witnesses had been drinking, some heavily, and their stories were not always consistent. But most important, the victim told investigators that she did not remember anything that happened from shortly after the time she arrived at the party. The victim would be unable to counter claims that she had consented. The trial would be fought over differing versions of the victim’s sobriety and behavior, with several witnesses and potential defendants motivated to paint her in an unfavorable light.

The result would be such a confusing and conflicting account of what happened that we would be unable to convince 12 jurors to convict. For example, the media reported that the victim vomited. But lab tests showed that the vomit did not come from her. The defense would challenge any account which depended upon the vomit to prove that the victim was too intoxicated to consent.

These cases depend upon a careful weighing of the facts. However, now that we have decided not to file charges, ethical responsibilities limit my ability to discuss all of the evidence in this case. My first duty is to the teenager, who did not choose to have her life dragged into the media. When we do not file charges, it is unfair to the victim to release details of the incident in order to justify our decision. Releasing such information would also discourage victims from reporting assaults in the future.


more ...

http://www.sccgov.org/portal/site/da/menuitem.311b6004a2316af82b9900dd5a30a429?path=%2Fv7%2FDistrict%20Attorney%2C%20Office%20of%20the%20%28DEP%29%2FNews%20and%20Events%2FNews%20Releases&contentId=652823f858dd2110VgnVCM10000048dc4a92____&cpsextcurrchannel=1



FYI, the kid who owned the house (specifically, whose family trust owns it in his name) was involved in a hit and run accident hours before the party. I wonder if he'll get prosecuted for that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_De_Anza_baseball_players_rape_case#_note-100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC