You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #97: So corrected, however [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Spirit of 34 Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. So corrected, however
I still find Alexander's claim dubious and overly broad. I'd have to see some stats (and sources w/ methodology) to back up that claim. Also, since WI, IL, and DC are the only non-issue states left (can't believe WI is still in that category), I think shall-issue stats vs. may issue stats would be more telling than concealed carry vs. no concealed carry.

A couple of other points--

1. That map is not entirely accurate. For example, CT is listed as "shall issue", which technically it is, but the statute allows for a pretty big loophole to judge applicants by entirely subjective criteria, so, in practice CT is "may issue". Also, it does not account for municipal laws-- although NY and MD are "may issue" states, in practice NYC and Baltimore are "no issue" cities, and in CA, Frisco has a sweeping handgun ban.

2. The point I particularly took issue with in Alexander's description of CC licence requirements was the "letter of good reference" from your local police department. Although a few supposedly "shall issue" states include this requirement, I can think of no better dividing line between a truly "shall issue" CCW law and a "may issue" one than requiring the subjective opinion of police as to someone's "character" or "fitness" to carry concealed-- such a requirement is open to abuse, discrimination and prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC