You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: there are not "two sides" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. there are not "two sides"
There is no philosophy or ideas from the other side. It is a power and a money grab, and it uses bigotry and hatred to gain support from the general public. The "ideas" - the ones Rahm was talking about when he said "we welcome the ideas and concepts of the Republicans in the administration" are just sales and marketing pitches intentionally intended and crafted to mislead the public and sabotage the national political discussion.

There would be no "partisanship" were we not obligated to defend ourselves, were we not under assault from the wealthy and powerful few. Disappearing partisanship disappears us. The right wingers have no need for partisanship. They already hold the power and wealth. They don't need politics or government, either.

The whole point of partisanship, of politics and government, is so that the left out and left behind have some voice, some way to gain a share of power and resources.

Promoting post partisanship is contradictory to democracy, justice, self-government and equality and incompatible with the traditional principles and ideals of the organized Labor movement, the political Left, and the Democratic party.

Including people is one thing. Including the ideas and concepts of those who would exclude most of us from protection of our rights and from access to power and resources is not "inclusiveness."

Inviting the fox into the hen house is not "including all voices," it is putting most voices at grave risk,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC