You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: His point was spot on, and here's why [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
29. His point was spot on, and here's why
Edited on Sat Jul-24-10 10:15 AM by ProSense
Jones: "rather than bash President Obama for not changing the country as fast as they'd thought, they should maintain hope and help him with his agenda."

We're three months away from an election and it seems that people are campaign against the President more than against Republicans.

People need to realize that at some point you have to act, and that was Jones' point. Take health care and this Daily Kos diary:

<...>

Did you know that nearly $1.9 billion would have been refunded back to consumers if the new health law was in effect in 2009?

Nearly $1.9 billion would have been refunded in 2009 by the six largest for-profit health insurance companies had the rules been in effect, according to an Oppenheimer & Co analysis cited in the report.

UnitedHealth (UNH.N) would have spent $867 million in refunds last year, the report said.

In a sign that the medical loss ratio is not improving for patients ahead of the implementation of the reforms, UnitedHealth announced this week that it spent 81.5 percent of premium revenue on medical care in the second quarter, a decrease from 83.6 percent a year earlier.



The purpose of the diary is to encourage people to stay engaged as the law becomes implemented.

That $1.9 billion or more is going to be still in play in 2011. From Health Care for America Now (PDF)

Starting in 2011, health plans must rebate to consumers and employers the difference between the minimums and actual spending on health care. If the new law had been on the books in 2009, the six largest for-profit health insurance companies would have been required to refund $1.9 billion in that year alone for spending too much on profits, CEO pay and administration, according to a report by a Wall Street analyst (see Table 1).2


That's a lot of money on the line. So after all the effort to demonize the bill, the trick is now to get people reengaged to ensure that its full effects and benefits to consumers are realized.

Jones was basically saying even if you believe the bill doesn't go far enough, do everything you can so that we don't lose momentum.




edited for clarity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC