Reply #98: I would agree under normal circumstances

[Blasphemer]

Nothing is 100% but in an extraordinary circumstance (as this would be) where fraud is allegedly involved, then it wouldn't simply be a matter of the condom failing. It might be hard to prove whether or not the child is a result of failed birth control or the fraud but if there is proof of his claim then her actions would have been the most likely reason for reproduction rather than failed birth control. I have a hard time with the idea of holding a person responsible under such circumstances. Now, his story could be completely fabricated but in theory if such a situation happened, I completely side with the defrauded partner.