Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

War's 'hidden cost' called heavy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Crackingham Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:22 AM
Original message
War's 'hidden cost' called heavy
A forthcoming request for additional funds to continue waging war in Iraq will not begin to address the "hidden cost" of the conflict, according to Pentagon officials and other government authorities who say that tens of billions of dollars more will eventually be needed to repair or replace heavily used equipment and to compensate for the wear and tear on members of the armed services.

The Pentagon next month plans to ask Congress for up to $100 billion in supplemental funds to pay for the ongoing combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing the total budgeted so far to well over $200 billion. But military officers say the administration's estimates do not include the investment that will be necessary to fix what they say they fear is becoming a broken ground force.

"We're going to be paying for this war for years to come," Representative Martin T. Meehan, a Lowell Democrat and member of the House Armed Services Committee, said by telephone yesterday from the Middle East, where he has been touring US military bases in Iraq. "We are not preparing for much of the cost."

If the war were to end today, according to a preliminary estimate by the Congressional Budget Office that was described by officials who have been briefed on it, the Army would still need at least $20 billion more than budgeted over the next three years just to be at the same level of preparedness as before the war.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/01/14/wars_hidden_cost_called_heavy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. This calls for another round of tax cuts
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Meanwhile Bush is concentrating on fixing the Social Security 'crisis'
We will see Bush and his Congress try to come up with the money for his fiasco in Iraq by cutting spending on 'social programs' that provide retirement and health care (and VA assistance) that benefit middle and lower income Americans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You hit the nail on the head!
The SS "crisis" solution is a smoke screen for ending SS forever. The people of this broken, staggering, failed nation can not let these plunderers ruin and steal all that is left. We will be greatly hated by our descendants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. And all the god fearing conservatives
in red states who blindly supported bush will be amongst those hurt worse when social programs start to suffer. The same folks who spent years howling about tax and spend liberals when they raised their little heads up from the trough. The same folks, who, by god, support our troops and hate homosexuals in the name of Jesus Christ. The same folks who maintain marriage by maintaining high rates of divorce, incest, spousal abuse and teen pregnancy. The same folks who don't know a damn thing about stock market investing but who blindly follow the orders from the pulpit and from the radio. The bush base in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulGroom Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Throughout the presidential campaign...
I saw no one on television ever mention, in discussing Kerry's estimates of the war's cost, that all the appropriations for the war did not cover the amount that was being spent out of the normal Pentagon outlays, which would eventually have to be paid up.

Including all of those costs, Kerry's price tag for the war of $200 billion was actually much lower than the real cost.

We are a nation of blithering idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC