Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Satellite images showed undersea mountain hit by U.S. sub

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 11:30 AM
Original message
Satellite images showed undersea mountain hit by U.S. sub
Satellite images showed undersea mountain hit by U.S. sub

By Christopher Drew
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

January 24, 2005

Satellite images of the area where a nuclear submarine grounded two weeks ago clearly show a wedge-shaped undersea mountain that stretches across more than a mile of a desolate expanse of the South Pacific.

Defense officials have said the mountain, which rises within 100 feet of the surface, was not on the navigation charts that the Navy uses. One sailor was killed and 60 were injured when the submarine, the San Francisco, smashed into the mountain, or a reef jutting out from it, at high speed Jan. 8.

The satellite images, taken in 1999 and early 2004, suggest the mountain is part of a larger range of undersea volcanoes and reefs. And they show it sits more than three miles to the northwest of the nearest possible hazard on the charts.

More..

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050124/news_1n24sub.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't know satelittes could "look" 100 feet into the ocean - interesting
We really need to start a war on undersea mountains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did their explanation for this sound like they believe that . . ..
possibly this land mass moved due to the tsunami? After all, we lost 40 seconds out of a 24-hour day due to the "jolt" the Earth in its axis took?

I do not understand why a nuclear sub does not use another kind of radar. If sonar makes too much noise, I'm sure there is something else they can come up with. Their are other types of radar like Viper and Doppler. Of course, they use them for the weather, but wonder if they knows but it just doesn't sound like common sense to me. Guess one needs to be a nuclear sub physicist to figure this one out.

Just seems to me that the story is not complete and has been doctored a bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Radar doesn't work under water. It's radio waves. No penetration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Those underwater mounds must hate our freedom


FYI: Submarines cruise following charts and using passive sonar (just listening). If the sub is running slow and quiet enough, unlike the 30 knot speed of the SF, then many times biologics will reveal and underwater mound or mountain. The typical sound is the snapping sound of shrimp that gather around mounds. When traveling fast the sounds are obviously not apparent.

Active sonar ((pinging)) would have revealed the presence of the mountain, but active sonar would also have given away the position of the sub which defeats the purpose of the stealth mode of the boat.

Radar is only used on the surface and does not operate underwater. This sub collision is just one of those things that happens when you trust that your bathymetric charts are accurate while pissing along at 30 knots only to find out the charts are outdated and inaccurate. **it happens..

Revised maps will prevent further problems of this nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torque67 Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Here's some information about sonar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonar

It's pretty interesting, and was readable by a non-nuclear-sub-physicist :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Nothing to do with the tsunami
This was in a different ocean, and we did not 'lose 40 seconds'. The North Pole shifted about an inch, and shortened the day by less than 3 microseconds, NASA calculate (they think they may be able to measure it, but it's too soon to be able to measure something so small now). A microsecond is a millionth of a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Classified? But here is the location...look...why was this sub there?
http://geography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mapquest.com%2Fmaps%2Flatlong.adp


Latitude: 7° 45 Min.1 Sec.
Longitude: 147° 12 Min. 6 Sec.:



The exact location of the crash remains classified. But the undersea mountain shows up on the satellite images at a latitude of 7 degrees, 45.1 minutes north and a longitude of 147 degrees, 12.6 minutes east.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kool Link
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 02:59 PM by grumpy old fart
Thanks. First time I've used Mapquest for such a thing. And, why wouldn't we be there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TyObe Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. You've made a navigational error
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 05:05 PM by TyObe
N7 45.1' E147 12.6'
is the same as
N7 45' 6" E147 12' 36"

It's a little over 30NM east of the spot you plugged in:
N7 45' 1" E147 12' 6"


One of the fast boat squadrons is homeported in Guam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. We probably know less about the depths of the oceans than we do about
our own solar system--truly the "last frontier" of scientific exploration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Indian Ocean does not follow earth's curvature...
Has anyone else heard this? That way before the Tsunami it had a below sea level depression in it of considerable size. Can't find the info right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. This can happen due to gravitational anomalies
There can be depressions or accumulations of water due to the variations in the earth's gravitational field, caused by differences in crustal thickness or density.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clearly that's not a natural formation...
Now we know where that pesky underwater UFO base has been hiding....
wonder how they move it around...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TyObe Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. I found a 5,000ft mountain once...
Edited on Mon Jan-24-05 04:46 PM by TyObe
It wasn't on any of the charts. Luckily, we still had 2500fm water under the keel at when it peaked out.

A submarine almost always operates a high frequency narrow beam fathometer (I'm not aware of anytime you'd be allowed to shut it off other than tied to the pier, but I haven't done everything). Usually, if you are within say 10NM of shoalwater (any place where the sub could hit an obstacle without exceeding max op depth), the CO will station additional navigational people including a dedicated fathometer watch. Normally, it's checked a few times an hour. When you get way too close to another submarine, you'll be able to hear their fathometer.

Other ships can pick up your active sonar far past the distance it allows you to see. It's got some major drawbacks from the stealth perspective. Also, I'm not sure how well they work at All Ahead Flank. They use a high freq sonar continuously under-ice, but you're expecting obstacles there.

If you look at an offshore chart, you'll see where the surveying ships went--they're a bunch of long criss-crossing lines of soundings. Sometimes there's a couple miles between them, especially in areas that are off the great circle routes between major ports/harbors.

They went from well over 30kts to 4kts instantaneously. There's only 3 people that wear seatbelts--the diving officer and the two helms/planesmen. Everyone else took a tumble.

Ty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC