Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Crude Oil Jumps to 4-Month High ($52 barrel )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 06:57 AM
Original message
Crude Oil Jumps to 4-Month High ($52 barrel )
Crude Oil Jumps to 4-Month High; Cold Snap Drains Fuel Supplies

Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil rose to a four-month high, approaching $52 a barrel in New York, as a Siberian cold front gripped western Europe and forecasts called for freezing temperatures in the Northeastern U.S.

The surge in heating-fuel demand may drain inventories of heating oil and diesel. U.S. supplies probably dropped last week by 1.75 million barrels, according to a Bloomberg survey of forecasts before the government releases weekly estimates later today. Surging demand may strain supplies this year, with only OPEC able to pump more oil.

``It's mainly the cold snap that's added $4 or $5 to prices, particularly with Europe having a freeze from Siberia,'' said Jason Kenney, an analyst at ING Financial Markets in Edinburgh. ``The market is concerned that Russian supply growth won't be outstanding and that China is drawing a lot of oil. For prices to come down, you need for supplies to go ahead of demand.''

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a5dB61QJTaas&refer=home

Call me "silly"... but it appears that this is normal weather in February...what the hell is odd? MAYBE it's the US dollar and the US deficits which causes the price of oil UP -- since it is priced in DOLLARS--- not EUORO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. there goes my oil stocks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Or maybe it's time to start using Google.
Look up the term "Peak Oil"

I firmly believe it's here. If it is, then your world and mine are going to change a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. absolutely --- add in the Iran war chant and you have trouble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. its not odd at all
we've reached the early stages of the peak oil crisis. Oil prices are erratic, shifting drastically on the smallest change. Cheap oil production no longer meets demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. they are revamping the way they count oil reserves
Energy sector seeks reserves revamp
Industry-sponsored study asks SEC to update system
By Stephanie I. Cohen, MarketWatch
Last Update: 6:45 PM ET Feb. 23, 2005


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The rules by which oil and gas companies report underground reserves is outdated and may be vastly misjudging untapped energy supplies, according to a study released Wednesday by Cambridge Energy Research Associates.


One of the biggest problems with the system, crafted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 1978, may be that it is grossly underestimating reserves, indicated the report, funded by several major oil and gas exploration companies.

The SEC's system "is out of synch with the way markets operate today," said David Hobbs, a director at CERA and co-author of the report.

snip

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7b81D95...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, they are trying to count oil shales and tar sands now
Even though you get far, far less rate-of-return out of these than out of conventional oil wells, it makes it look better on paper to say they have these as reserves. Most oil shales and tar sands aren't even minable, as they require massive amounts of energy and water to extract the oil. Ironically they are located in areas like the US Southwest, which in the best of years is a dry grassland/semi-desert in many areas. Not much water in Nevada or Arizona to spare extracting oil, when droughts, irrigation and human demands are peaking annually.

Like smokers taking drags off discarded cigarette butts they find on the ground, the oil industries are really trying to scrape the bottom of the barrel here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildmanj Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. prices
its called PRICE GOUGING using weather as an excuse----go back and look at the huge profits big oil just reported----that invisible hand of the market is lifting $'s from your budget and food from your table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just in time for Spring Break vacations
Rip the money right from the pocket of those who saved all year to take a break from winter and drive south for a couple of week.
I bought gas last night and sat in lines like it was 1970. I got gas for $1.65 all other stations in area were at $1.99 just on news of the rise in prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-24-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. but but Exxon has trouble making "ends meet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Another peak oil canary
It should be no surprise petrochemicals are a finite resource. But yet, the US has been an overall laggard to petrochemical independence. We are essentially 20 years behind in the energy technology movement because we essentially squandered a thrust into R&D in alternate fuel technologies because of an apparent "crude oil glut". We might be making hybrids now, but it's almost too late.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC