Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: U.S. produces fewer terror convictions than officials claim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:07 AM
Original message
MSNBC: U.S. produces fewer terror convictions than officials claim
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 12:50 AM by usregimechange
On Thursday, President Bush stepped to a lectern at the Ohio State Highway Patrol Academy in Columbus to urge renewal of the USA Patriot Act and to boast of the government's success in prosecuting terrorists.

Flanked by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, Bush said that "federal terrorism investigations have resulted in charges against more than 400 suspects, and more than half of those charged have been convicted."

...

Fewer convictions than advertised
An analysis of the Justice Department's own list of terrorism prosecutions by The Washington Post shows that 39 people — not 200, as officials have implied — were convicted of crimes related to terrorism or national security.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8185798/

Primary Source:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/11/AR2005061100381.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me know if anyone finds the WP link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. here you go
I don't know when part 2 will be published.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/11/AR2005061100381.html

U.S. Campaign Produces Few Convictions on Terrorism Charges
Statistics Often Count Lesser Crimes

By Dan Eggen and Julie Tate
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, June 12, 2005; Page A01

First of two parts
...
CONTINUED 1 2 3 4 Next >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. here's another: The Terrorism Case That Wasn't -- and Still Is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ummmmmm...
Is anything ever as the "officials" claim it to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not when we are dealing with pathological liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Not in this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. And where is OBL? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. And where is the anthrax mailer?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. My friend's son who has worked on the anthrax situation
for the last two years in D.C.is totally depressed. All their work has resulted in nothing. No charges, etc. You think it could be an inside job by this administration for the sole purpose of histrionic fear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Of course it was. They know the anthrax came from a specific US
military site. Why don't they review the video of the guy coming in after hours, AFTER he had been fired? I don't think the investigative group is trying too hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. where is the ANTHRAX investigation Mr. President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. There some that say the anthrax mailer is a right winger.
One who's some how attached to the anti-abortion movement. That's why the Bush mis-administration has been so slow to catch the perpetrator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. "crimes related to terrorism"
Do we have a list of these people and what "crimes" they were convicted of?

Because we all know how conservative the Bush admin is in labelling crimes "terrorism" :eyes::eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. 7 are charged with running a "bad" website: media keeps talking
about riots and car burnings.
But they're not actually killing anybody, that's okay with George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Hmm. I know a certain "bad" website that was advocating violence
towards the end of the Terri Schiavo case. ;) So I'm sure His Chimpyness is going to be right on the ball in investigating THAT. Right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does the god damned press know the word LIE?
In other words, Bush told bald-faced LIES when he spoke. Why can't they
just say that? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. see post #6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. More evidence of the pattern of lies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. "...not 200, as officials have implied..." IMPLIED!?! More like LIED!
"...charges against more than 400 suspects, Minus "...more than half of those charged have been convicted..." does NOT equal 200.

(more than 400) O.K. lets say 425

Minus

(more than half) we'll say 55% not really a number most would risk the bad press by torture people,

So, 425 x 55% = 234

Now let's divide that by 4 years of destroying the U.S. reputation to the world = 59 per year, even if the Lie was true, not much to brag about.

Take 39 divided by 4 years ALMOST equals 10 convictions per year.

Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. They just left off the C-H, as in C-H I-M-P-L-I-E-D = Chimp Lied
Anyone who has been watching this administration's modus operandi for the last few years knows they're going to lie about this if they're going to lie about anything at all. I'm just surprised he didn't say 800.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. And all for minor crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. And please tell us, wise leader of the most powerful country on earth...
just how many of those convicted were actual terrorists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder if this 16-year-old was one of the 39.
Teachers and Classmates Express Outrage at Arrest of Girl, 16, as a Terrorist Threat
Published: April 9, 2005

At Heritage High School in East Harlem, where the student idiom is hip-hop and salsa, the 16-year-old Guinean girl stood out, but not just because she wore Islamic dress. She was so well liked that when she ran for student body president, she came in second to one of her best friends - the Christian daughter of the president of the parent-teacher association, Deleen P. Carr.

...According to a government document provided to The New York Times by a federal official earlier this week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has asserted that both girls are "an imminent threat to the security of the United States based on evidence that they plan to be suicide bombers." No evidence was cited, and federal officials will not comment on the case.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/09/nyregion/09suicide.html?ex=1118721600&en=aed0986785180d3e&ei=5070&oref=login

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1381775
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Whopping Discrepancies on Terrorism Prosecution Claims from Bush
Washington Post Exposes Whopping Discrepancies on Successful Terrorism Prosecution Claims from Bush
12 June 2005



In the first of a two part series, the Washington Post has exposed whopping discrepancies in claims from Bush on Thursday that “federal terrorism investigations have resulted in charges against more than 400 suspects, and more than half of those charged have been convicted.” Bush made this claim, while “flanked by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales”, in a speech to promote renewing the Patriot Act.

Those statistics have been used repeatedly by Bush and other administration officials, including Gonzales and his predecessor, John D. Ashcroft, to characterize the government's efforts against terrorism.

But the numbers are misleading at best.

An analysis of the Justice Department's own list of terrorism prosecutions by The Washington Post shows that 39 people -- not 200, as officials have implied -- were convicted of crimes related to terrorism or national security.

Here is where it gets better…

http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=1068
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. WaPost is outing Bush**'s lies? Someone catch me, I'm gonna faint!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. question: at what point does OVERSTATEMENT become a lie?
Edited on Sun Jun-12-05 04:06 AM by radfringe
I'm sick of these fluffy words - overstatement, misled etc. It's a freaking lie!

If you "overstate" deductions on your tax form does this mean you get a lesser penalty/fine as opposed to lieing on your tax forms? If you give "misleading" testimony in court does this mean perjury charges are less severe than if you lied? of course not - but apparantly this standard doesn't apply to the bushies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Hey, where did you get your dancing bananas?
Check out this little one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. I made them
if you want a file copy - PM me with your e-mail and I'll send them out to you

or you can just "grab them"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. So for a measly 39 convictions
it doesn't seem the Patriot Act is doing much good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. And we're fighting a "war" and spending the nation's treasury ....
and lives on 39 measly convictions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. i have been waiting for an article such as this--as i heard bush rattle
off stats (jim leher show) one night and i bolted up--where the heck did those numbers come from!!!!!!


Head line should read.......than Bushies claim! (whimpy headline).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. nominated--send to all news outlets as Bush is on the renewal swing
of the Patriot act (and new devestating provisions)---and most in congress agee with the snot. lets keep this on the radar screen!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
27. Please tell me officials haven't disassembled about terrorist convictions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
28. Yes, Washington Post and MSRNC, we've known this was a lie since
Ashcroft was spewing it. Where have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBeans Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. "officials" claim?
Why don't they come out and say that BUSH claims, since the story cites HIS baldfaced lie in the very first paragraph.

Our president lies, and that should be the headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
33. I think that constitues a LIE wouldn't you???/
Isn't a lie something you say that isn't true???? How many lies can these lying liars get away with????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. It gets worse
"Only one in nine individuals on the list had an alleged connection to the al-Qaida network, and only 14 people convicted of terrorism-related crimes — including Faris and Sept. 11 plotter Zacarias Moussaoui — have clear links to the group. Many more cases involve Colombian drug cartels, supporters of the Palestinian cause, Rwandan war criminals or others with no apparent ties to al-Qaida or its leader, Osama bin Laden."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
38. This will disappear by Monday, nice Friday dump though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC