Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush denies he influenced Iraq elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:34 AM
Original message
Bush denies he influenced Iraq elections
<<SNIP>>
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/?feed=TopNews&article=UPI-1-20050717-09102200-bc-iraq-candidates.xml

Bush denies he influenced Iraq elections

WASHINGTON, July 17 (UPI) -- Bush administration officials say they drew up but did not proceed with a plan to influence the January elections in Iraq.

The New York Times reports that the National Security Council issued a statement Saturday denying the charge that the government helped candidates they favored.

An article in the next issue of The New Yorker reports that the White House decided to go ahead with the plan despite Congressional outcry.

The Bush Administration disputes the story by Seymour Hersh, saying the final decision was to not influence the election.

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. I always believe the administrations version of things


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. lol
yeah, I am prone to believe lying pieces of crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sure he didn't.
His lying is boring me now. It is not even outrageous any more, it is pathetic. He does it and does it. He is getting worse at it. These are the pathetic habitual lies of a pathetic coke headed drunk who cannot ride a bike. I guess we are supposed to take his twitching and blinking as signs of a truth telling saint with Jayeezus's own private phone number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. What you said. It is impossible to keep up with his lies anymore.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Great post
You sum it up so well, and even made me laugh which can be hard to do these days.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. What the bush White House screwing w/ the vote?
<Bush administration officials say they drew up but did not proceed with a plan to influence the January elections in Iraq.> :rofl:

Gee, I remember seeing (until they got pulled) pictures of the same
Iraqis in different voting lines around Baghdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Just like the whopper..."The war plans for Afghanistan were just sitting
on the shelf", when queried as to why we were all ready to invade right after the bogus 9-11 attack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. they thought about it
planned it and prepared for it...but changed their minds in the end?

Right.

Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, do you suppose Georgie has a credibility problem, maybe
he can't be trusted because all of his lies are catching up to him.
All I can say is BWHAHAHA!
:rofl:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Lots of denials coming from the WH these days. Will folks start to
notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Somebody is......
my right-wing Rat-publican boss. About 2 months ago, he came up to me and said, "The war in Iraq was based on lies".

Now, coming from a lifelong Repub who's gotten into several scraps with me over politics, that's a major statement.

He conceded that he can't trust anything the government does anymore. = Translation, you were right all along Cliss. I condede. Yeah, people are noticing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. That's encouraging. I've heard the same from a few. They say
yeah, he lied but all politicians lie; he HAD to do something; it was for the good of the nation, blah, blah, blah.

All depends on how loyal they are to the Repuke party. Some justify the actual lie, others justify the act of lying, only a couple Repukes that I know regret their vote for the idiot.

Still, it is progress I suppose, moving beyond the denial phase to the defensive, hoepfully to be followed by acceptance that he's a worthless, corrupt, criminal POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I hear the exact same thing, especially the "All politicians Lie" thing
The only thing I would have to add is, its about their own stupid arrogance and pride.

They do not want to admit they were duped, because they are to smart to be duped.

Oh well thats OK, I will let them have their backdoor, just as long as they take it.

:dilemma:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I would feel sorry for therm
were it not for the fact their ignorance has made us all pay dearly - and in Iraq, our soldiers and innocent Iraqi civilians are paying with their LIVES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I hear ya, my sentiments as well Skittles! N/T
:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Drew up a plan to influence elections...
...but didn't use it.

Yeah, right...

Did they also draw up plans on how to influence US elections through similiar means? Can we see those plans please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. too bad they didn't make the same decision in Ohio
....and in Florida. I guess they didn't think it was wrong here to "influence" elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush may not have overtly influenced the election, but he rigged the count
From February 19, 2005:

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/2295/2

The former Marine also said that the Jan. 30 elections, which George W. Bush has called "a turning point in the history of Iraq, a milestone in the advance of freedom," were not so free after all. Ritter said that U.S. authorities in Iraq had manipulated the results in order to reduce the percentage of the vote received by the United Iraqi Alliance from 56% to 48%.

Asked by UFPPC's Ted Nation about this shocker, Ritter said an official involved in the manipulation was the source, and that this would soon be reported by a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist in a major metropolitan magazine -- an obvious allusion to New Yorker reporter Seymour M. Hersh.<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. His constant lies are part of the Big Lie propaganda scheme
The reason Bush lies so much is that the more he lies, the less outraged the people will become over time, or so goes his reasoning. It will benefit us to keep up the anger over his lies; this anger is justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. hard enough to get the true election count from US states
the info that this administration had open influence
in backing their candidate and in the final vote
count seems rote now....when you can install and
dethrone people at will in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bush didn't help *candidates* he favored
But the question is still open whether the administration provided help to parties it favored.

You have to watch every word these bastards say. Remember when Rumsfeld said that during the Neverending War on Terror the administration would not be constrained to tell the truth, and then about two days later, he announced that the administration had changed course and would not peddle disinformation?

Impeachment. Impeachment. Impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. FREEDOM'S ON THE MARCH!
What fucking pigs! Democratic Middle-East my ass!

What about the plans to influence elections in the U.S.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bush 'sought to influence polls in Iraq'
Bush 'sought to influence polls in Iraq'

July 17 2005 at 10:44AM

New York - American President George Bush approved a covert plan to influence the outcome of Iraq's January 2005 election, but dropped it amid opposition from the United States Congress, the New York Times reported on Sunday.

After debate within the White House, "the president's national security team recommended that he sign a secret, formal authorisation for covert action to influence the election," the Times said, citing "a dozen current and former government officials" familiar with the discussions.

"Bush either had already signed it or was about to when objections were raised in Congress. Ultimately, he rescinded the decision," the Times said.

All the sources spoke anonymously, except for Frederick Jones, spokesperson for the National Security Council, who would not comment on whether a formal authorisation ever existed.
(snip/...)

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3&art_id=qw1121589361655U262
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Senate/Congressional republicans slapping the outstretched hand of *?!
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 06:22 AM by no_hypocrisy
Amazing.

F***. He probably did it anyway. Reagan never let Congress get in the way of a good time in San Salvador, Nicarauga, and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Rescinded the decision? 2 words...
Bull. Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Hey.... what's good for Amurka (Diebold) is good for Iraq, I'm
just sayin'.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cadfael Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. There's an aritcle about this in the NY Times
WASHINGTON, July 16 - In the months before the Iraqi elections in January, President Bush approved a plan to provide covert support to certain Iraqi candidates and political parties, but rescinded the proposal because of Congressional opposition, current and former government officials said Saturday.

In a statement issued in response to questions about a report in the next issue of The New Yorker, Frederick Jones, the spokesman for the National Security Council, said that "in the final analysis, the president determined and the United States government adopted a policy that we would not try - and did not try - to influence the outcome of the Iraqi election by covertly helping individual candidates for office."

The statement appeared to leave open the question of whether any covert help was provided to parties favored by Washington, an issue about which the White House declined to elaborate.

The article, by Seymour M. Hersh, reports that the administration proceeded with the covert plan over the Congressional objections. Several senior Bush administration officials disputed that, although they recalled renewed discussions within the administration last fall about how the United States might counter what was seen as extensive Iranian support to pro-Iranian Shiite parties.<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/politics/17elect.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks. One line from your article says it all:
The article, by Seymour M. Hersh, reports that the administration proceeded with the covert plan over the Congressional objections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I thank those CIA agents that brought this story to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Raise your hand if you are surprised
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. "Spreading Freedom" Bush style.
This administration is such a fucking scam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. Kind of like in Ohio, right?
He's getting on my last nerve. It's totally insulting at this point!

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Or .....how about the 2000 and 2004 election as well?
I believe former-President H. W. Bush may have rigged his congressional election
through an interesting change within his election district.

The seed and their cabal doesn't fall far from the roots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. Is the CIA ticked!!! they leaked the story!!!
this administration doesn't know what a elections is about!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's true for once. They just couldn't get those Diebolds over there
quick enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. Someone should photoshop Bush with 10 purple fingers. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. they rigged US elections, of course they rigged Iraq elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yuh, sure....btw, where are those WMD they also lied about? Even the
republicans are getting sick of Bu*h's lies and corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
34. sort of like he didn't influence the iraq war
my motto: when chimpy says one thing, immediately know that he did the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh.
For moment there I thought the administration wasn't being straight forward with the American people.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. FLASHBACK: bush Cartel calls Hersh a LIAR over secret Pentagon group.
...bush Cartel admits to Congress existance of secret Pentagon group.

Gee who to believe, Hersh proven right time after time, or the proven liars bush Cartel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. From "there are no plans on my desk" to
"There are plans on my desk, but I didn't use them". Actually, just drawing up the plans to interfere with another country's "democratic" election shows criminal intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. If they had a plan for it in Iraq. . .
:think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emendator Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. Yeah right
In an election in a country of 60% Shiites, where the Sunnites sat out, after having to wait for almost 3 weeks for the US to count the votes, the result is a Shiite victory of 49% (although they did end up getting 51% in the parliament). Yeah, that sounds like a really great election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC