Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Bush's Space Plan in Danger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 10:43 PM
Original message
WP: Bush's Space Plan in Danger
Shuttle Program's Deficit May Mean Far Fewer Flights

Thursday, November 24, 2005; A01

A large deficit in NASA's troubled shuttle program threatens to seriously delay and possibly cripple President Bush's space exploration initiative unless the number of planned flights is cut virtually in half or the White House agrees to add billions of dollars to the human spaceflight budget.

Sources familiar with ongoing negotiations between NASA and the White House say the administration has no intention of spending extra money to deal with a shortfall that some space experts say could exceed $6 billion from 2006 to 2010, when NASA plans to retire the shuttle for good.

The source of the deficit is the travail that has plagued the shuttle program since the Columbia disaster in 2003. After a single flight by Discovery this summer, the orbiters -- grounded for 2 1/2 years after Columbia -- are out of action again until at least May while engineers work to make them safer.

(snip)

The impasse has put the future of Bush's "Vision for Space Exploration" in doubt less than two years after it was announced. Without extra money, experts say, NASA could have trouble developing a new "crew exploration vehicle" by 2014, as originally planned, let alone fulfilling Griffin's wish to fly it by 2012. The dilemma is also fueling an odd confrontation between the administration and Congress, where once-wary lawmakers now appear willing to provide the extra funding even as the White House backs away from its own initiative.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/23/AR2005112301970.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good! Keep Nasa in turmoil until a new President can be elected.
Then an intelligent strategy can be implemented. Don't spend ANY money until the visionaries are give their due.

Too bad about the next 3 years, though. Important work could have been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Too bad; I'm a fan of the space program.
The second Neil Armstrong made his footprint on the lunar surface, Congress started cutting NASA's budget. If they kept pouring money into the program, we'd have bases on Mars and the moon; which is a lot more beneficial for humanity than turning the Middle East into George Bush's personal parking lot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. That point was made in'69
And I still agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Space warfare is more beneficial for man , How???
I'm glad the war industry didn't get this little wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. The whole "Bush to Mars" thing was bullshit anyway
We've been marching backward on this since at least 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. I was really hoping he would personally lead the mission....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Americans are starving to death
without food stamps, dying without medicare/medicaid attention, suffering the loss of any equality of opportunity due to student loan cutbacks, and this cowboy is worried about outer space?

SEND HIM THERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hypatia82 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. In all fairness...
NASA is a huge jobs program. Not many places for aerospace engineers to work besides NASA. Problem is NASA gets treated like a red headed stepchild. Also the problems you list could be fixed with people helping people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. NASA gave us CAT scans & kidney dialysis
We should be worried about space, and the technology we've developed as a result of our attempts to explore it. I can't even remeber all of the things we've gotten as a result of space exploration (not including technological distractions like NASCAR engines and Tang).

The problem with the Rhinestone Chimp is that he has no plans for space expolration, just attempts at some kind of bizarre public-relations hand-holding exercise that has scientists across the world (people trying to make the wolrd a better place) shaking their heads in disbelief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Moonbase to Bush. Moonbase to Bush. Reality Sucks, Bush.
Get used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. the wilt house is shrinking away from everything bush has ever done...
eventually he'll backpedal on the tax cuts as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. You mean people actually took bush's "proposal" seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-23-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. without the space program none of us would be posting here.
There would be no microcomputer chips. The baby boomer's among us surely remember how big and clunky the original calculators were. The space program was instrumental in bringing down the size and weight of computer chips. We went to the moon with 16K of memory. The pace program is the only government program to put forth the kind of technological progress it has, with the exception of war. Given that kind of choice we should be spending a lot more on the space program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gasping4Truth Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Any sources to back that up?
I think the manufactures of computers had enough economic incentives of their own to keep making their products smaller and smaller, that they need not worry about the advantages of their technology to some government-funded program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. the vast majority of the early advances were before computers were
Edited on Thu Nov-24-05 10:51 AM by stevebreeze
available to the general public. Computers are just one aspect, the led is also a product of the space program, and what would we do without Tang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Where can I go to get some Tang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Laser in the optical mouse, and indrectly ARPANET
Besides the optical mouse, which is certainly convenient, an argument could be made that since NASA and control of near space was integral to preparing for a nuclear war, and ARPANET came out of that same struggle, then space exploration was indirectly responsible for the creation of the modern Internet(s).

Okay, so it's a weak argument. Sue me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Then You Have No Understanding of the Economics Of Engineering
The military is the first customer, and pays through the nose, enabling the company to cover the costs of development and debugging and setting up manufacturing. The corporate business comes next, at a slight improvement in price as economies of scale grow. Then the off-shore Asian firms buy one or two, so they can reverse-engineer and make it cheaper for consumer use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. The thing I always wondered about Bush's space plan is...
Edited on Thu Nov-24-05 12:17 AM by phaseolus
...what was in it that he wasn't telling us?? Since the 60s there have been secret little military things buried in the space program that we don't really hear about, and it's probably a necessary evil on some level -- but I don't trust *this* crowd not to make it into something that's pure evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I think they believe there's oil on the moon
Edited on Thu Nov-24-05 12:22 AM by Canuckistanian
They think every planet's got a soft, creamy, center, just waiting for the Halliburton Space Agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Heh. Seriously, though, I think they're worrying about the Chinese space
Edited on Thu Nov-24-05 12:35 AM by phaseolus
...initiatives.

Any administration should look at that situation, and perhaps take steps to make sure that we're suddenly not a superpower and someone who might concievably hate us in the future is.

But you just gotta suspect that *this* administration, and future ones like these clowns, would try to use space supremacy as a way to put a boot up everyone else's asses for their own amusement and crush them all later, and that would be evil.

A good administration with real leaders, competent leaders like we had through much of the 90s, if they saw a space weapons race on the horizon, would work like hell to get a treaty in place to make the Apollo program philosophy a worldwide reality -- "We came in peace for ALL MANKIND." Most Republican administrations, demonstrating the competence and leadership we've seen for the last 5 years, would take us down the road to destruction and the end of civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I say, Godspeed, Taikonauts!
And I don't think that Shrub gives a gnat's worth of attention to Nasa's Space Program.

He's probably forgotten what he said yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's better than oil...
it's Helium 3.

The Chinese have announced that they will launch 10 rockets by 2017 to go after the Helium 3. My guess is that the US Space Program has been officially offshored to China and * is just engaging in a bit of pre-emptive CYA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. Mars, bitches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. I firmly believe (with my tinfoil beanie in place)...
... that Bush's whole speech on space exploration and a return to the moon was to alter the Google search for "Bush Moon".

Before his speech, if you googled those words, you got the whole Rev. Moon connection with Bush and the various whackjobs like Falwell.

Afterwards, the first 5 pages of search were for Bush commenting on returning to the moon.

You can't convince me that * understands the advantages and drawbacks of space travel, much less gives a rat's ass. And funding?... forget it!

I think Rove planned the whole thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Shhh! You'll embarrass him!
You know..."tell the truth and shame the devil" ?!?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'm for funding it if we can vote on the astronauts!
So long, Dick. Bye bye, Shrub. Condi . . . zip up your flight suit and make room for Messrs. Frist and Delay. Pickles, you want to go? Ta ta. Now where's that Mehlman? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polemonium Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. no corporate profits in space, screw the space program
Screw it all except private defense contracting. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisonerohio Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think Bush's plan all along is to trash the space program.
I mean really the space program has been dead for a while, but his plan is the final nail in its coffin. There is a large group of people who voted for him simply because they have the fantasy that we will one day go to mars and Star trek will come true or something. At the same time he is trashing all the real science being done for a plan that will take a decade to come about. That the plan is already failing doesn't surprise me at all. That was Bush's plan all along. End the space program and fund the money to the new wars. You don't actually think if they end the space program the money will go to the people do you. I think there are a lot of good benefits to going to mars, there is no way its going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. i think BushCo's Mars plan was tied to his Star Wars plan, you know, sneak
the controversial space missile busters' very expensive r&d in with the Mars program, which in BushCo's minds is less controversial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
27. Lets hope so
Who benefits from space exploration -- big companies. Let them pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maggie_May Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
32. Can we say
we are broke! I wish they would stop with bullshit and just say it. When the kids come to you ask you for some new gadget and you don't have the money. The answer is "I am broke."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. The next people on the Moon will be Chineese. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC