Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld suppresses 'insurgent' ("an epiphany")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:04 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld suppresses 'insurgent' ("an epiphany")
WASHINGTON (AFP) - US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has decided to avoid using the word "insurgent" to describe the Iraqis fighting US and Iraqi forces in Iraq.

Rumsfeld told reporters Tuesday the switch was the result of "an epiphany" he had over the weekend.

"I thought to myself, 'You know, that gives them greater legitimacy than they seem to merit," he said.

"Why would you call (Al-Qaeda's frontman in Iraq Abu Musab al-)Zarqawi and his people insurgents against a legitimate Iraqi government with their own constitution. Do they have broad popular support in that country? No."

When General Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, couldn't think of a better word than insurgents to use at a Pentagon press conference, Rumsfeld jumped in.

"Enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government. How's that?" he said.

Webster's New International Dictionary defines "insurgency" as "a condition of revolt against a legitimate government, not reaching the proportions of an organized revolutionary government, and not recognized as a belligerency."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051129/pl_afp/usiraqrumsfeld


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe that's code ?
Maybe now, they're going to decide that the "real" enemy is North Korea? No, ooops - Iran? Or what about Venezuela? These freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. More wordsmithing from the spinmeisters
We're now engaged with the EOTLIG? Gimme a break.

Epiphany this, shitbird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't Zarqawi from Jordan, and only 5% of the "insurgency" is foreign
Edited on Tue Nov-29-05 04:15 PM by sabra
nice try Rummy, nice try... The man is totally out of his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Poof! No more insurgency!
That was easy. Why haven't we had Rumsfeld in charge of everything?

Think what he could do about the deficit, unemployment and pollution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. i now deem
the deficit: a sign of healthy and vibrant government spending

unemployment: robust growth in the job-seeking population

pollution: after effects of a strong industrial economy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. lol, renegade, good one!
How about

no child left behind: we'll send them ALL to Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. It looks like Rumsfeld should have no problem with "insurgents"
Edited on Tue Nov-29-05 04:26 PM by daleo
I prefer "forces in opposition to illegal invasion and occupation", if Rummy wants to get wordy about it.

On edit - The headline "Rumsfeld suppresses "insurgent"" makes it sound like he actually picked up a gun and went on patrol in Baghdad. Naturally, he was just disputing the dictionary, though. Better watch it Rummy, some of those dictionaries can get pretty big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. not surprising
rumsfeld has an extraordinarny handling on the english language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. OMG...this reads like a piece straight out of the Onion.
A team of the best comedy writers could not possibly come up with this material. I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I thought the exact same thing
Maybe Rumsfailed can write for them when he's in jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rumsfeld today...that was sad.
And some of the reporters pushed past his flippant non responses to questions. Rumsfeld tried to stop one question about an article in the New York Times, and the reporter listened to him and kept on going to ask his question. It was about the Army's use of white phosphorous. Rumsfeld lateraled to Peter Pace, and Pace said white phosphorous is an incendiary weapon not chemical.

Is that true? Phosphorous? Can't chemicals be incendiary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And nerve gas is just a tranquilizer, to settle your nerves
Chlorine gas is just a disinfectant really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. He just means it's not a "chemical weapon" i.e. poison.
It just burns you to death in a particularly horrific manner.

Doesn't that make you feel better now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. When I took chemistry
phosphorous was considered a chemical. I remember my chem teacher loved to show off the phosphorous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. calling him a human gives him greater legitimacy than he seems to merit
friggin' vampire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm reminded of Lovitz's SNL character..."yeeaahhh...THAT's the ticket!"
Edited on Tue Nov-29-05 05:31 PM by cyberpj
Pathological Liars Anonymous
Tommy Flanagan.....Jon Lovitz

Announcer: And now, a message from Pathological Liars Anonymous.



Tommy Flanagan: Hello, my name is Tommy Flanagan, and I'm a member of Pathological Liars Anonymous. In fact.. I'm the president of the organization! I didn't always lie. No, when I was a kid, I told the truth. But then one day, I got caught stealing money out of my mother's purse. I lied. I told her it was homework -that my teacher told me to do it. And she got fired! Yeah, that's what happened! After that, lying was easy for me.

I lied about my age and joined the army. I was thirteen at the time. Yeah.. I went to Vietnam, and I was injured catching a mortar shell in my teeth. And they made me a three-star general! And then I got a job in journalism, writing for the National Enquire.. er, Geographic! Yeah.. I was making twenty thousand a ye.. month! In fact, I won the Pulitzer Prize that year! Yeah, that's the ticket.

And then my cousin died - Joe Louis - and I took it hard. Maybe too hard - I tried to kill myself. Yeahh.. I did kill myself! Sure! I was medically dead for a week and a half! It was a woman that brought me out of it - Indira Gandhi! Yeah, right.. And she told me about Pathological Liars Anonymous. Oh, you'd be surprised how many famous people belong. In fact.. at one of the meetings I met my wife - Morgan Fairchild! Yes, I'm a change man now, and all because of Pathological Liars Anonymous. Why, I - I even have my picture on the cover of Newsweek magazine. Yeah. Every day! Yeah.. that's the ticket! Yeah, you betcha!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. When the Sec. of Defense says it's really all about what you call it...
you know we're in trouble. And it's sort of telling on the Administration's mind set...

This guy has a serious role in the government. He's not a talking head on TV. This is real life for a lot of people who are effected by his decisions. An epiphany on terminology? Great. Glad you thought that one through.

Let's try "exit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good. Grief.
Apparently if you don't call them insurgents, then *poof* they'll all go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. He wishes.
RumsFailed wishes they would all go away. His prayers are about to not be granted, however.

Rummie is looking very tired these days. He's discouraged. He's fed up that people, even generals, historians, political science experts are calling him "incompetent". Man, that hurts.

It hurts so much, that he even came out last week and claimed that "he didn't really want this war". It was a feeble excuse, and nobody bought it. You see, they all read the PNAC documents which have Rumsfeld's signature on the bottom. So much for that flimsy alibi.

The fact is, Rumsfool is a very wealthy man. He was worth about $134 million before he started as Sec of defense in 2000. Just imagine what he is worth now.

Rummie wants to spend some of that money. Kick back with a cold one, just relax. Instead of arguing with these goddamn reporters. He's got money! He doesn't need these fools who won't accept reality, even after he explains it. Rummie is going on 75 years old. He's old. He feels that he's earned some vacation time. Guess what, Don? It ain't gonna happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think that was an epiphany, Rummy, I think that was
flatulence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. ROFL!
Thanks for the comic relief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. LOL, yeah, brain flatulence
Good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Seems to me
Someone finally told Rummy the American people are on to that word, "insurgent," since most Americans know the war was and still is based on lies, greed for oil, world domination, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Any person in Iraq that is against the US/UK Occupation is a
Terrorist. Any Iraqis that are killed by US/UK Forces is a Terrorist. It
is really that simple.

Iraqi Insurgency

In January 2005 Iraqi intelligence service director General Mohamed Abdullah Shahwani said that Iraq's insurgency consited of at least 40,000 hardcore fighters, out of a total of more than 200,000 part-time fighters and volunteers who provide intelligence, logistics and shelter. Shahwani said the resistance enjoyed wide backing in the Sunni provinces of Baghdad, Babel, Salahuddin, Diyala, Nineveh and Tamim. Shahwani said the Baath, with a core fighting strength of more than 20,000, had split into three factions.

The main one, still owing allegiance to jailed dictator Saddam Hussein, is operating out of Syria. It is led by Saddam's half-brother Sabawi Ibrahim al-Hassan and former aide Mohamed Yunis al-Ahmed, who provide funding to their connections in Mosul, Samarra, Baquba, Kirkuk and Tikrit. Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri is still in Iraq. Two other factions have broken from Saddam, but have yet to mount any attacks. Islamist factions range from Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al-Qaeda affiliate to Ansar al-Sunna and Ansar al-Islam.

A picture of the composition of the insurgency, though in constant flux, has come into somewhat greater focus. London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies estimates roughly 1,000 foreign Islamic jihadists have joined the insurgency. And there is no doubt many of these have had a dramatic effect on perceptions of the insurgency through high-profile video-taped kidnappings and beheadings. However, American officials believe that the greatest obstacles to stability are the native insurgents that predominate in the Sunni triangle. Significantly, many secular Sunni leaders were being surpassed in influence by Sunni militants. This development mirrors the rise of militant Shia cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr vis-à-vis the more moderate Shia cleric Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_insurge...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. I'm sure we wouldn't like it one bit.
Neither did our founding ancestors - the originators of this country.

War of Independence, and so on. People forget history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. the meaning of insurgency
is a known unknowable in a world of knowing unknowns
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Not true, not true. You can't know whether you know known unknowns
Everyone knows that. And we know where the insurgency is. It's in the areas to the north, west, and east of Tikrit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. those may be the facts on the ground
but they are certainly not the facts in my head.

hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. Look in the mirror, Rummy!
"Why would you call (Al-Qaeda's frontman in Iraq Abu Musab al-)Zarqawi and his people insurgents against a legitimate Iraqi government with their own constitution. Do they have broad popular support in that country? No."

Do the US/UK have broad popular support in that country? Hmmmmm? I'm waiting. NO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. I always referred to them as so-called insurgents.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. Okay, I'll say what we're all thinking...
How about "freedom fighters?"

Jeez, all of these old white men would have a stroke.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomburn Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
The insurgency is enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government.

Rumsfeld is capabple of an epiphany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. Gag me. Enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government?
That's the US, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. rummy needs to focus on serious matters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. Rummy needs to see a shrink
He cannot understand reality anymore.
You shock and awe innocent people and you create the insurgency.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. Do these idiots think none of us read 1984 in high school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
35. If they'd spent as much time planning the war ...
...as fretting over what to call things, they might not look so foolish.

(Not that the bush's war itself is mitigated.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Insurgents rarely have "broad popular support"
initially. Their support builds. When they win, you can't find anyone that didn't support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
39. Really, it all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. whatta GENIUS!
like when he banned digital cameras from our gulags



peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
41. The new name shall be........
We shall now call the insurgents, the insurrectionist but I doubt that junior could pronounce the word correctly. I'd love to hear him try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
42. Action Speaks louder than words!!!
Bush has made Words meaningless!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
43. Reminds Me Of The Old "Homicide Bomber" vs "Suicide Bomber" Nonsense!
:eyes:

When they start splitting hairs over such idiotic things, it's clear that they know they're in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC